在昏暗的红灯笼罩下，银行家马丁·哈尔斯与莉希陷入了爱河。《阿斯科纳别墅》的核心人物起初觉得这位单身父亲不过是有个潜在的长期自由职业者。直至她自己也发觉对他动了感情。两人都在盘算着莉希的离去，然而他们共同畅享幸福的美梦，或许会被他人的狭隘不容所击碎。

暂无英文版的简介，请添加内容帮助我们完善数据库。

暂无剧情简介

A small community and a strong family bond, in which a dialog between mother and daughter blurs the line between the need for clarification and the desire for healing. Slowly and carefully, we reveal the symbolism behind the cherry tree, which the mother is having chopped down. It takes time for wounds to heal, and patience to find images and language to speak about what used t...

暂无英文版的简介，请添加内容帮助我们完善数据库。

A staging of a young man's liberation from his bourgeois confinement using only music and sounds.

He was a bloodthirsty vampire, an androgynous Adonis and a psychopathic killer. He's a friend of the director Lars von Trier. He gives an impressive performance in almost every one of his films. His face and his pale green eyes have etched themselves into the minds of his audiences. Udo Kier is one of the few German actors to achieve global fame via Hollywood. In the past fifty years, he has been in more than 250 films, ranging from art-house productions to blockbusters. Kier first major role was as a sinister upright citizen called Hans. The fact that he ended up staying in Hollywood was down to serendipity, like so much else in his life.

Why am I standing in the slow line? Why am I being fired? Why is she falling in love with him and not me? Why me? That's the question we all ask ourselves so often. In thousands of situations. In six episodes, David Schalko, with his trademark dark humor, tells of life situations in which this question is central: WHY ME?

One of Gabriela Zapolska's most famous comedies, it was written in 1907. A realistic story of a marital triangle, precisely constructed in terms of the psychology of the characters. In this classic production, director Tomasz Zygadło emphasizes above all the truth and universality of human characters and behaviors.

His name is the symbol of the traitor: Judas, the disciple of Jesus who delivered him to the cross. But is he really seen correctly or is our entire interpretation, our entire view of Judas not based on a mistake? Ben Becker becomes Judas and defends himself - with a text by Walter Jens, he puts the story into perspective and makes us think again about the supposedly clear-cut case of Judas. He stands in Berlin Cathedral, accompanied by the organ of cathedral organist Andreas Sieling, and makes it clear that he, Judas, cannot be a traitor because there was no betrayal. After all, what did he reveal that everyone didn't know anyway? That Jesus claimed to be the Son of God? After all, he didn't hide it himself. Where was he? Thousands knew that anyway...