晚会由西藏自治区党委宣传部、组织部主办。展现了来自全国各地的援藏干部人才，发扬老西藏精神，缺氧不缺精神，艰苦不怕吃苦，海拔高、境界更高，坚守理想与信念，坚持实干与担当，书写雪域高原长治久安和高质量发展新篇章的真挚故事。

晚会运用情景再现的形式，展现了来自全国各地的援藏干部人才，发扬老西藏精神，缺氧不缺精神，艰苦不怕吃苦，海拔高、境界更高，坚守理想与信念，坚持实干与担当，书写雪域高原长治久安和高质量发展新篇章的真挚故事。

2016年夏天，居住在东京的一群穷人策划了一场持续一周、大胆冒进的活动。他们打算在东京都内各地同时开展大大小小共计50多个项目，日夜不停地尽情玩乐。这个计划名为“无限制东京自治区”。他们觉得选举和战争都毫无意义，决定自己创建自治区，随心所欲地做想做的事！消息传开后，来自日本国内和海外的300名穷人纷纷响应：“我要参加！”

在一个充斥着杀手的危险世界里，一名警察踏上了一场毫不留情的征程，试图将死囚之王拉下马。

来自北京的支教老师韩松初到藏区，恶劣危险的生存环境立马给了他一个下马威，被狼王追赶，被动物夜袭，艰苦的生活条件让他不知所措，但藏区学童和同胞们对他的热情与照顾却温暖人心。孩子们眼中的纯真和对学习的渴望感染了韩松，他克服一切困难，承担起所有科目的教学，在朝夕相处中与孩子们结下了深厚的情谊。平静美好的支教岁月被打破，猖狂的盗猎者夜闯学校伤人，韩松和学童们经历了生死的考验，又因远在北京的韩母病危不得不分别。在所有学童的殷切期盼中，最终韩松选择回到高原，将自己的青春和生命奉献在这里，与善良美丽的藏族姑娘格桑梅朵一起，助力一代又一代的西藏学子改变人生实现梦想。

德国29岁有着移民背景的年轻导演Burhan Qurbani的处女作，电影通过三个互相联系的故事反映了今天德国的一体化进程。这部电影名字叫做《沙哈达》（Shahada），取自穆斯林信仰的一个阿拉伯名字。三个故事被精心得编织在一起。一个非法堕胎的女孩蒙受着羞辱准备远离原教旨教义控制的地方；一个男同性恋带着和教义冲突的性取向的挣扎；还有一个警察，在妻子前面他是个好穆斯林，但事实上有段婚外情。

德国29岁有移民背景的年轻导演布尔汉·库尔巴尼（Burhan Qurbani）的处女作《沙哈达》（Shahada），这个片名取自穆斯林信仰的一个阿拉伯名字。影片通过三个相互关联的故事，展现了当下德国的一体化进程。这三个故事被巧妙地交织在一起：一个非法堕胎的女孩，因蒙羞而打算离开受原教旨教义控制的地方；一个男同性恋者，在与教义冲突的性取向问题上苦苦挣扎；还有一名警察，在妻子面前是个好穆斯林，实则有一段婚外情。

德国29岁有着移民背景的年轻导演Burhan Qurbani的处女作，电影通过三个互相联系的故事反映了今天德国的一体化进程。这部电影名字叫做《沙哈达》（Shahada），取自穆斯林信仰的一个阿拉伯名字。三个故事被精心得编织在一起。一个非法堕胎的女孩蒙受着羞辱准备远离原教旨教义控制的地方；一个男同性恋带着和教义冲突的性取向的挣扎；还有一个警察，在妻子前面他是个好穆斯林，但事实上有段婚外情。

故事发生在日本江户时代中期，财政紧张的仙台藩正值第七代藩主伊达重村（羽生结弦 饰）在位时期。冷酷无情的财政担当萱场杢（松田龙平 饰）推动出台严苛的税负措施，将财政压力全部转嫁到农民和商人头上。不堪重负的人们或者破产，或者举家逃亡。户籍的流失并未警醒当政者，反而将固有的赋税平摊到留下的人们的头上，使局势进一步恶化。放眼望去，整个仙台藩暮气沉沉，前途暗淡。　　从属于仙台藩的宿场町吉冈宿上下一片萧条，经济极度不景气。酿酒商谷田屋十三郎（阿部隆史 饰）十分担心家乡的未来，为此他找到号称全町最聪明的菅原屋笃平治（瑛太 饰）商讨计策，进而制定出向藩主放高利贷，并赚取巨额利息的计划。　　在此之后，十三郎和弟弟浅野屋甚内（妻夫木聪 饰）以及一众好友合力奔走，他们四处游说，试图让父老乡亲倾囊相助，如果集资目标达成，他们将获得高达一千两（约合三亿日元）的房贷资本。与之相对，一旦计谋败露，二人将面临斩首的命运。这群被逼到绝路的人们，运用自己的智慧发起了博取金钱大作战……

"The Theme" is a film that had to stay on the shelf for almost ten years because of its "theme". Mikhail Ulyanov plays Kim Yesenin, a disillusioned and cynical playwright who uses the system by writing the conformist plays and enjoys the benefits of being the officially recognized and appointed "great Soviet writer" but who in reality has been used by a system and spent all the talent he ever had in writing the plays that had no artistic value whatsoever. Bitter irony lies in the name of the character: Sergei Yesenin was a real life enormously talented, widely popular and beloved Russian poet who committed suicide at the age of 30 in 1925 because he could not fit in the Soviet Russia. Kim Yesenin in the movie suffers the writing block and arrives to the small provincial town with a friend and a young mistress in search of inspiration. He meets an attractive, intelligent and well educated museum guide named Sasha (Inna Churikova never looked so beautiful and sophisticated and I finally understood why Panfilov always had been fascinated by her face, never conventionally pretty) who used to be a big fan of his earlier works but has a lot of unflattering things to say about his officially praised outings. Sasha is in love with a talented historian who had made a very difficult and life changing decision to emigrate from the Soviet Union. He had lost his job by becoming a dissident and had to work as a gravedigger to support himself while waiting for permission to leave the country. Those who never had to emigrate from their country knowing that they might leave forever and never be allowed to go back to see their loved ones and the places dear to their heart again would not fully understand why Panfilov's film had to stay on the shelf for almost ten year after it was completed. It was released only during the "perestroika" in 1987 and I saw it then. I respect Panfilov for his siding with the real artists rejected by the system but his film is not only a courageous statement against the conformity suffocating cultural life under the Brezhnev regime which would be later called "period zastoya" or "stagnation", it is a memorable work of cinema with very good performances from his muse, Inna Churikova, Mikhail Ulyanov, and supporting cast.