2020年，当世界还处于停滞状态，此时的中国，武汉街头已经恢复了昔日活力。南京马拉松参加人数：1万人；火爆的直播带货，线上购物；万人的武汉工厂，零人感染，产值翻倍；这些中国企业，如何在严格防疫的同时，做到逆势爆发？日本纪录片导演竹内亮，走近中国的后疫情时代。 　　Japanese documentary director Takeuchi Ryo recently got an email from his Japanese friend, asking about why there hasn’t been a second wave of pandemic in China. As a Japanese living in China, he realized, not only China has gotten the pandemic under control, its economy is recovering at a rapid speed. Why is China able to achieve this during the post-pandemic era? He began his search by visiting enterprises and industries that have achieved positive economic growth after the pandemic.

《后疫情时代》2020年，当世界还处于停滞状态，此时的中国，武汉街头已经恢复了昔日活力。南京马拉松参加人数：1万人；火爆的直播带货，线上购物；万人的武汉工厂，零人感染，产值翻倍；这些中国企业，如何在严格防疫的同时，做到逆势爆发？日本纪录片导演竹内亮，走近中国的后疫情时代。

我们的社会是一个劳动型社会。从小，我们就被教导要注重结果和竞争。随着自动化和人工智能超越了人类的能力，我们将被迫重新思考工作在我们生活中的角色：今天存在的大多数工作可能会在未来几十年内消失。关于这个问题的讨论一直由技术专家和经济学家主导，并且往往被描绘成科幻反乌托邦故事。而从人本身思考的视角缺乏。没有去思考工作对我们作为人类的意义。电影跨越四大洲，试图以一种存在主义的方式回答当今时代工作的意义，未来可能的情景以及当我们不再工作时会发生什么。

改编自同名小说。 　　为了将引发史无前例的大流行事态的病毒ARS-24活用为生化武器而推进秘密项目的政府和郑有铉博士为阻止"人类灾难"而孤军奋战的故事。

我们的社会是一个劳动型社会。从小，我们就被教导要注重结果和竞争。随着自动化和人工智能超越了人类的能力，我们将被迫重新思考工作在我们生活中的角色：今天存在的大多数工作可能会在未来几十年内消失。关于这个问题的讨论一直由技术专家和经济学家主导，并且往往被描绘成科幻反乌托邦故事。而从人本身思考的视角缺乏。没有去思考工作对我们作为人类的意义。电影跨越四大洲，试图以一种存在主义的方式回答当今时代工作的意义，未来可能的情景以及当我们不再工作时会发生什么。

改编自同名小说。 　　为了将引发史无前例的大流行事态的病毒ARS-24活用为生化武器而推进秘密项目的政府和郑有铉博士为阻止"人类灾难"而孤军奋战的故事。

It took two years for Mehran Tamadon to persuade the four supporters of the Iranian regime to risk taking part in an experiment with him. Now he receives them as guests at his family’s country house to try out something that does not exist in Iran: a pluralistic society. As the women disappear into the guest rooms, the men discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a secular society, the veil, abortion, freedom of the press… The guests not merely outnumber the filmmaker, who is critical of the regime, but are also masters of rhetoric. Again and again, they twist his words and use them against him. His secular society, they argue, is just as ideological as their religious one. The mood is contentious, but there’s also a great deal of communal laughter, prayer and cooking. In the end, the attempt to create a social utopia fails as there are simply too many issues that are non-negotiable. But does that mean that the experiment itself has failed? After all, for a brief time, differing lifestyles and opinions managed to co-exist. A dialogue took place. For the filmmaker, however, there’ll be a high price to pay. (Berlinale 2014)

It took two years for Mehran Tamadon to persuade the four supporters of the Iranian regime to risk taking part in an experiment with him. Now he receives them as guests at his family’s country house to try out something that does not exist in Iran: a pluralistic society. As the women disappear into the guest rooms, the men discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a secular society, the veil, abortion, freedom of the press… The guests not merely outnumber the filmmaker, who is critical of the regime, but are also masters of rhetoric. Again and again, they twist his words and use them against him. His secular society, they argue, is just as ideological as their religious one. The mood is contentious, but there’s also a great deal of communal laughter, prayer and cooking. In the end, the attempt to create a social utopia fails as there are simply too many issues that are non-negotiable. But does that mean that the experiment itself has failed? After all, for a brief time, differing lifestyles and opinions managed to co-exist. A dialogue took place. For the filmmaker, however, there’ll be a high price to pay. (Berlinale 2014)

2020年4月18日，《中国纪录片发展研究报告2020》与哔哩哔哩在线发布。发布会由北京师范大学纪录片研究中心、五洲传播中心和哔哩哔哩联合主办，北京师范大学艺术与传媒学院院长、长江学者特聘教授胡智锋主持，北京师范大学纪录片研究中心主任张同道教授发布研究报告。

2020年4月18日，《中国纪录片发展研究报告2020》与哔哩哔哩在线发布。发布会由北京师范大学纪录片研究中心、五洲传播中心和哔哩哔哩联合主办，北京师范大学艺术与传媒学院院长、长江学者特聘教授胡智锋主持，北京师范大学纪录片研究中心主任张同道教授发布研究报告。