"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

Documenting Horn & Hardart's iconic Automat, one of America's original and most popular restaurant chins in NYC & Philadelphia.

历史上第一部互动电影（interactive movie），观众可以通过按手中的红绿按钮来投票选择后面的剧情。1967年蒙特利尔世博会上捷克馆的一大看点。影片同时也是贯穿着捷克电影新浪潮的主题。

马克为了母亲替公司做伪证，遭神秘人要挟，被迫去银行盗巨款。银行经理竟是马克的初恋情人，取钱后两人旧情复燃。之后神秘人继续祸害马克，马克发誓摆脱…

阴霾冰冷、罪恶横生的现代化都市，勤奋努力的保险业务员马克（吴彦祖 饰）多年来都和精神分裂的母亲（惠英红 饰）相依为命。为了帮母亲搬入最好的养老院，马克努力赚钱，甚至不惜作伪证保护自己的地位。然而一失足成千古恨，他作伪证的事情被某个神秘之人获知，不仅账户中的存款盗取，还必须按照对方电话中的指示行事。在这一过程中，马克重逢在银行工作的高中时代初恋女友洁希（姚晨 饰）。谁知洁希也被神秘人算入迷局，她和马克的命运紧紧捆绑在一起。在此之后，马克还惹上了雄霸一方的黑帮老大泰哥（任达华 饰）。 　　神秘人仿佛高高在上、算无遗策的神明，洋洋得意操控着所有人的命运……

18岁的叛逆男孩伊恩（萨姆•赖利 Sam Riley 饰）最喜欢做的事就是把自己关在房间里听着摇滚乐，对着镜子为自己画眼线。在他的眼中，家乡小镇死气沉沉，毫无出路，而喊出人生真谛的摇滚乐才会使得人的青春有着那么点儿乐趣。这日，伊恩前往伦敦观看著名摇滚乐队性枪手的演出。伊恩似乎天生就是为了摇滚活着，他在演出会现场结识了性枪手的三位成员，当时正在寻找主唱的他们认定了伊恩就是最佳人选。于是，男孩伊恩开始了他的摇滚之路。

本片讲述了上世纪七八十年代摇滚乐巅峰时期，朋克集团的领军人物伊恩·柯蒂斯的故事：上世纪70年代的时候，在英国的一个小镇里住着一个怀揣伟大音乐梦想…

随着科技的进步和发展，一种能让犯罪之人“改邪归正”的新型药物被研发了出来，一位名叫李（雷·利奥塔 Ray Liotta 饰）的死刑犯作为试验品接受了药物的注射，通过实验数据的监测，科学家们发现除了暴力倾向的逐渐消除外，李的内心里还对受害者盖瑞（Mark Pickard 饰）产生了愧疚之情，这也就意味着，李已经逐渐的转变成为了所谓的“好人”。实验组让李重新回归了社会，并进行着持续的监控。 　　随着时间的推移，李的生活渐渐走上了正轨，他不仅努力工作，还交了一位漂亮的女友。心中的愧疚让李打起了看望盖瑞的念头，然而，盖瑞的哥哥比尔（蒂姆·迪凯 Tim DeKay 饰）却不愿意原谅李，他不仅绑架了李，还打死了监控李的工作人员。工作人员的死亡让警方误以为李“本性难移”，一边是步步紧逼的追捕，一边是凶神恶煞的绑匪，腹背受敌的李会遭遇怎样的险情呢？