It's hard to approach the good and bad in this film without being caught up a discussion of the message of BOSNA!, for this is a film that explicitly sets out to convert its audience to its side, to make people aware of the war and to try to influence them to pressure their governments to intervene. It's a film that's very aware of itself, of the process of its making and of the influence it might have: for example, Mitterand's visit to Bosnia is portrayed as an outcome of information given to the French President by the director, Bernard-Henri Levy. The film is full of very disturbing images: a mother and child fleeing from snipers in Sarajevo; bodies littering a street after a shell has landed on a bread queue, many of them with legs or faces blown off; starving prisoners staring at the camera through the barbed wire of a concentration camp. It's impossible not to be moved by the suffering of these people, and difficult not to feel anger at the inaction of the diplomats who do little but talk while people are fighting for their lives and homes. The film makes much of comparisons between Western indifference to Bosnia today and Western indifference to Czechoslovakia and the Spanish Republic in the 1930s. There is, suggests Levy, the same denial, the same explanations that it's all much too complex to get involved in. In 1945 people saw pictures of the concentration camps in Poland and said "never again", but now that the camps are back it seems that we would rather deny them, or suggest that there's fault on both sides, then determine to stop the atrocities. If there is anything I don't like about BOSNA!, it is the incessant wordiness of the voice-over. Perhaps Levy was so anxious to persuade that he didn't dare to let the audience come to their own conclusions. At times sounding like a Biblical prophet, at times hectoring us, at times reflecting on how the war affects our image of ourselves as Europeans, the narration never lets the eloquent pictures speak for themselves, pictures that have more than enough power to move and to persuade on their own.

在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那共和国建军三周年的时候拍摄的纪录片

故事讲述在南斯拉夫，一名塞尔维亚男子与波斯尼亚穆斯林女子坠入爱河。谁知波黑战争突然爆发并迅速蔓延，很快便发展成自第二次世界大战结束后欧洲爆发的…

暂无剧情简介

踏上难能可贵的探索之旅，了解拥有两千年历史的绚烂艺术文化，及其铸就的世界上最古老的帝国。 故事中的这片土地拥有两个名字：波斯——古老而神秘，充满冒险气息，强大的国王建造了大批雄伟的寺庙和宫殿，美景超乎想象；伊朗——骄傲、孤立，对外界的干扰不屑一顾。 BBC Studios获得了前所未有的特许，得以深入伊朗进行拍摄，展现这座古国非凡的历史与文明。从迷宫式的集市到波斯古代君主的都城波斯波利斯，再到圣火燃烧逾千年的火神庙，主播兼记者萨米拉·艾哈迈德（Samira Ahmed）带领观众一同踏上这段独一无二的难忘旅程。 在三集的内容中，萨米拉将揭示波斯文明在历史中的重要地位；在跌宕起伏的演变过程中，进一步了解其一次次的辉煌与陷落。在这趟旅程中，萨米拉还有一个重大发现：波斯人曾有一度几乎迷失了自我，直到一本书的出现，才使他们得以重新认识自身，继而实现波斯文化的复兴——《列王纪》（Shahnameh）。菲尔多西凝聚毕生精力的史诗巨著，没能在他生前为他赢得期望中的赞许与财富，却在他死后长久流传——《列王纪》不仅掀起了波斯语言与文化的复兴大潮，更在后世绵延千年的数度王朝更迭与社会变迁中，成为了维系波斯传统的重要纽带，为伊朗人民的文化认同提供了坚定的基石。

提起伊朗，你会想到什么？美以伊战争？悠久的历史文化？头巾遮面的女子？纷乱的政治局势？丰富的石油天然气资源？异域的风光美景？被封锁的霍尔木兹海峡？对于伊朗的想象，每个人都能给出不同的答案，但总逃不过一个关键词“神秘”，也往往存在诸多误解。历史上的伊朗到底经历过什么，它为什么是今天的样子？对不同文明的审视可以出自天性的好奇，同时也能帮助我们更好地理解自身。带着疑问与猜想，我们走进伊朗，用影像开启一次视觉与心灵的奇旅。 解读一个历史文化悠久的文明古国，往往会掉入浩瀚繁杂的历史当中。作为一档面向年轻群体的纪录片，我们更希望《波斯行》是一个勾起人们进一步了解伊朗文化的入口，只有产生兴趣，才会愿意去关心、去了解。鉴于此，我们将发挥影像艺术之所长，用形象生动的视觉表达，有趣有料的人物故事，进行一次历史人文的轻科普。

这是一部自然主题的乌托邦式的纪录片电影。本片中的护林人在伊拉克北部库尔德人山区已经找了25年波斯豹，之所以要找，是因为如果能找到这种珍惜动物，林区就能被宣布为国家公园，而敌人就不能再轰炸，库尔德人也就能获得珍贵的和平。本片寻豹不仅是主题，更上升为一种政治隐喻，表达作品批判性和人文关怀，作品制作精良，娓娓道来的叙事中透着淡淡的忧伤。结构处理上，一条是守林人寻找波斯豹，一条是他在山里遇到的各种人，形成历史和当下、战争与和平的隐喻。荣获2019年阿姆斯特丹国际纪录片电影节最佳荷兰纪录片奖。

跟随一群富有的年轻波斯裔美国朋友，他们将自己华丽、快节奏的洛杉矶生活方式与其家庭和传统的需求相结合。

兰菲带着一只藏有父亲新发明秘密的波斯猫途经香港，间谍黑珍珠将猫偷走。为躲避追踪，黑珍珠躲进了霍艾迪家。霍艾迪击退追踪者后，才发现他们是警探，而此时黑珍珠已带着猫逃得不见踪影。霍艾迪答应帮助兰菲找回猫，他建议兰菲另买一只相似的猫，接着向前来杀他的另一名女间谍伍秀雯放出消息，让敌人误以为偷去的猫没有藏着秘密，然后再找机会夺回真猫。匪徒绑架了兰菲，要求霍艾迪带着真猫来换人。霍艾迪带着假猫来到匪巢，假装让兰菲指示如何取出秘密，趁匪徒不注意时挟持匪首，带着兰菲逃走。匪首反抗并与霍艾迪搏斗，危急时刻，兰菲用石头猛击匪首，匪首坠崖而死，匪帮随即瓦解，兰菲最终得以带着猫离开香港。

Samira Ahmed presents a fascinating journey across 2,000 years of spectacular Persian art. Coming soon to BBC Four and BBC iPlayer.