老艺人曼弗雷德·派克特为了改变马戏团的处境建议经理加一个大象表演的节目，可他自己在表演空中飞人时，失足摔断了脖子，轮到他的女尔莱妮接棒用父亲的思想进一步改编马戏团的节目。对她来说这无疑是一种考验，她开始制订改革马戏团的计划，但在经济现实面前低头屈服，把马戏改造成电视上的常备节目。此时，莱妮的好友去世，她继承了好友的财产，决定买下旧的冬季马戏团表演场所，与男友一起重建马戏团，可是这一切都成为徒劳。

The film chronicles three days when a circus visits a small village in Kerala and creates ripples in the lives of the people. During this time, we learn the geography of the village - the banyan tree with leaves like transparent film, the shining water, the light in the sand at sunset… The film shows the lives of the villagers - school children running to the tent, the village women watching the acrobat perform, the soldier who befriends the circus strong man in a toddy bar, a pump attendant who sits on a rock each day watching a village girl bathe and dry her hair, the dwarf who brings back to the circus a watermelon larger than his head…. The bizarre characters from the circus merge with the local populace. The circus comes and leaves, and life goes on. Thambu won Aravindan the National and State film awards for the best director. Direction & Screenplay: G Aravindan Cast: Gopi, Nudumudi Venu, Sriraman, Jalaja, members of the Great Chitra Circus Cinematography: Shaji N Karun Music: M G Radhakrishnan When you planned the film THAMBU, what was uppermost in your mind: was it the problems and insecurities of the circus artists or the response of the villagers to the circus tent? I planned THAMBU as a documentary feature. The film was shot in Thirunavaya on the banks of Bharathapuzha. I came to this village with ten to fifteen circus artistes who had already left their circus company. We did not have a script, and we shot the incidents as they happened. What we did on the first day was to call all the villagers and perform a circus act for them. There were a lot of people who had not seen a circus before. We shot their responses as they were watching. We did not ask them to do anything. After the initial hesitation, they forgot the lights and the shooting and completely got involved in the circus. It was all very original. At that time the village was also getting ready for the Ayappan Vilaku festival, which we used in the film. Finally the whole village got so involved in preparing for its festival, they lost their interest in the circus. The film ends there. In fact it is a location film. Well, in THAMBU also, there is a discontented young man. This character was there in the film - young man from an upper middle class family returned from abroad and settled in the native land. I am fascinated by these kind of people. You see similar people in UTTARAYANAM also. This 'return' has been with us for a very very long time. Earlier people 'returned' from Singapore, Burma, Ceylon etc. Now they 'return' from the Gulf. That is the only difference. When they 'come back' they will build a big bungalow and live isolated from the others around. Their relationships are confined to those of similar 'type' - they will of course have their "weekend gatherings". The question is why do they 'come back' if they are unable to or do not want to mix with the people around? My young man is someone who is discontented with this sort of isolation and wants to be in tune with the people and surroundings. He does not like to sit at home. He starts learning to read Malayalam and then ask the circus whether he can join them and ultimately goes away with them. Just a small comment. Although apparently 'regional', your films, one could say are much broader - Indian. Your comments on contemporary issue reflect more a cynicism towards the present (as in your cartoons) than a nostalgic return to the past. To get back to the film - the young man has never been to see a circus, has he? No. When the circus goes back he just goes along with them. When a circus is on the move, the artists are resting or asleep. They have nothing to expect or remember from the places they visit or stay in. This young man takes a decision to go with them. Why? Perhaps a recognition that he is no different from them! Or is this decision merely coincidental? He could not get along with his family. To escape the home atmosphere he goes and finds a place under the Banyan tree and learns to read etc. I have included in the film the moment of his decision to join the circus. At home he was surrounded by rock music while he himself loves classical music. There you see him asking the circus to take him along. The circus manager tells him to get into the van. At that moment he has not identified himself with the circus - he is merely escaping from his environment. No one has taken note of him in the circus company. The film ends with the sequence of him sleeping by the side of the circus clown. For the circus, this journey is a stagnation. A period of rest, where as for the young man this trip is a progress and escape. We cannot really say predict what he will become or do... He could become anything...even a circus clown... We are not making it clear. The emphasis is on his escape from the immediate environment. As you are talking about the journey of the young man, it occurs to me that all your films have this aspect of a voyage to self-discovery or a 'movement' towards betterment of humanity. e.g. in KANCHANA SEETA, Rama carrying the sacrificial fire and going into the Sarayu River; in UTTARAYANAM, Ravi going into the forest; the arrivals and departures of the bogeyman in KUMMATTI according to the seasons; in CHIDAMBARAM Shankaran Kutty's search for peace in his troubled conscience etc. Your films seem to be myriad manifestations of the deep desire of human kind for answers, peace, meaning…? (Remains silent)

The film chronicles three days when a circus visits a small village in Kerala and creates ripples in the lives of the people. During this time, we learn the geography of the village - the banyan tree with leaves like transparent film, the shining water, the light in the sand at sunset… The film shows the lives of the villagers - school children running to the tent, the village women watching the acrobat perform, the soldier who befriends the circus strong man in a toddy bar, a pump attendant who sits on a rock each day watching a village girl bathe and dry her hair, the dwarf who brings back to the circus a watermelon larger than his head…. The bizarre characters from the circus merge with the local populace. The circus comes and leaves, and life goes on. Thambu won Aravindan the National and State film awards for the best director. Direction & Screenplay: G Aravindan Cast: Gopi, Nudumudi Venu, Sriraman, Jalaja, members of the Great Chitra Circus Cinematography: Shaji N Karun Music: M G Radhakrishnan When you planned the film THAMBU, what was uppermost in your mind: was it the problems and insecurities of the circus artists or the response of the villagers to the circus tent? I planned THAMBU as a documentary feature. The film was shot in Thirunavaya on the banks of Bharathapuzha. I came to this village with ten to fifteen circus artistes who had already left their circus company. We did not have a script, and we shot the incidents as they happened. What we did on the first day was to call all the villagers and perform a circus act for them. There were a lot of people who had not seen a circus before. We shot their responses as they were watching. We did not ask them to do anything. After the initial hesitation, they forgot the lights and the shooting and completely got involved in the circus. It was all very original. At that time the village was also getting ready for the Ayappan Vilaku festival, which we used in the film. Finally the whole village got so involved in preparing for its festival, they lost their interest in the circus. The film ends there. In fact it is a location film. Well, in THAMBU also, there is a discontented young man. This character was there in the film - young man from an upper middle class family returned from abroad and settled in the native land. I am fascinated by these kind of people. You see similar people in UTTARAYANAM also. This 'return' has been with us for a very very long time. Earlier people 'returned' from Singapore, Burma, Ceylon etc. Now they 'return' from the Gulf. That is the only difference. When they 'come back' they will build a big bungalow and live isolated from the others around. Their relationships are confined to those of similar 'type' - they will of course have their "weekend gatherings". The question is why do they 'come back' if they are unable to or do not want to mix with the people around? My young man is someone who is discontented with this sort of isolation and wants to be in tune with the people and surroundings. He does not like to sit at home. He starts learning to read Malayalam and then ask the circus whether he can join them and ultimately goes away with them. Just a small comment. Although apparently 'regional', your films, one could say are much broader - Indian. Your comments on contemporary issue reflect more a cynicism towards the present (as in your cartoons) than a nostalgic return to the past. To get back to the film - the young man has never been to see a circus, has he? No. When the circus goes back he just goes along with them. When a circus is on the move, the artists are resting or asleep. They have nothing to expect or remember from the places they visit or stay in. This young man takes a decision to go with them. Why? Perhaps a recognition that he is no different from them! Or is this decision merely coincidental? He could not get along with his family. To escape the home atmosphere he goes and finds a place under the Banyan tree and learns to read etc. I have included in the film the moment of his decision to join the circus. At home he was surrounded by rock music while he himself loves classical music. There you see him asking the circus to take him along. The circus manager tells him to get into the van. At that moment he has not identified himself with the circus - he is merely escaping from his environment. No one has taken note of him in the circus company. The film ends with the sequence of him sleeping by the side of the circus clown. For the circus, this journey is a stagnation. A period of rest, where as for the young man this trip is a progress and escape. We cannot really say predict what he will become or do... He could become anything...even a circus clown... We are not making it clear. The emphasis is on his escape from the immediate environment. As you are talking about the journey of the young man, it occurs to me that all your films have this aspect of a voyage to self-discovery or a 'movement' towards betterment of humanity. e.g. in KANCHANA SEETA, Rama carrying the sacrificial fire and going into the Sarayu River; in UTTARAYANAM, Ravi going into the forest; the arrivals and departures of the bogeyman in KUMMATTI according to the seasons; in CHIDAMBARAM Shankaran Kutty's search for peace in his troubled conscience etc. Your films seem to be myriad manifestations of the deep desire of human kind for answers, peace, meaning…? (Remains silent)

Undisturbed by the gunshots in the background and the corpse floating by on the muddy river, a motley group of men are gambling with their money as if there's no tomorrow. When Donai has no bills left, he wagers all of his possessions and valuables but loses them to Ibragim, who is not too thrilled about this turn of events. After all, the meager belongings in Donai's apartment have little value. But then Mira, Donai's young and beautiful daughter, comes to visit from Russia and Ibragim insists that she will come with him, despite her loud protests. Daler, a young and charming wheeler-dealer who is part of the gambling group, is immediately smitten with Mira and steals her away while Ibragim and Donai are arguing. With the help of her savior, Mira gets to know the life in Dushanbe, a city where the sounds of frequent bursts of machine guns and sirens punctuate the days, and nights are patrolled by tanks enforcing martial law. As Mira reluctantly begins to return Daler's advances, the two find an unlikely refuge - a funicular where he has been staying, with the operating booth and the cable cars serving as their cozy home. Under Daler's control and suspended in the air with Dushanbe down below and the snow-capped mountains in the horizon far away, the funicular becomes their haven. As both their fathers are looking everywhere for them, Daler and Mira attempt the impossible: to think about love in a time of war.

一场给全球带来浩劫的灾难降临，David不得不依靠儿时所学的求生技能来维持生存。他孤身一人，在位于蛮荒之地边缘的一座帐篷里找到了栖身之所。不久后，另一名幸存者Mary出现了，她对David的求生技能表示怀疑，两人甚至还成了“在黑暗中徘徊的其他生物”的猎杀目标。这些神秘的生物会不会就是导致全球浩劫的罪魁祸首呢？

Christopher Lee hosts this horror anthology series from Poland with stories from various classic authors.

百花剧团来到一座老戏院演出，演员青红在听了看门的老张讲述戏院的奇异事件后，长时间陷入幻觉之中，还与“幻觉”里的人物春梅相处。最终，二人以“双簧”的形式合作完成了一场令人震撼的演出，帮老张和春梅圆了舞台梦。

本片主角银都戏院位于泰国曼谷，它是当地最后一座独立电影院，也有人称其为东南亚硕果仅存的高级电影院。银都戏院气派典雅，自1969年开业后，为几代影迷提供过服务。影片记录了2020年9月戏院拆除的过程，以及工人的生活状况。本片导演的父母曾在此电影院工作，所以她也难以回避一段不堪回首的记忆。

云起　　《帐篷秀》这部电影讲述了人与之间的关系是如何影响到人们的社会交往的，表明了一切悲剧都是从内部演变而来的，而且在悲剧发生前，很多事情往往会很有喜感。　　这部电影一共讲述了四个故事，这四个同时发生的故事，讲述了四种社会关系：爱情、友谊、尊重和合作。四个故事各有各的主人翁，这些人物在生活中或多或少有着一些联系。他们或者是在现实中有交往，或者是在网络上有联系。虽然在生活中有着这样或那样的意外，但是这些人都生活在自己的世界里，他们只注意自己的事情，而不去关心别人的生活——似乎整个世界只有他们才是最重要的组成部分，他们只关心别人说了什么，而不去探究别人这么说究竟是为了什么。　　只不过，这种表面上的独立性其实是不存在的，当一个人出现了问题之后，他的问题很快就会在别人身上得到体现。故事发生在海边，静谧或汹涌的大海、崎岖而宁静的高山似乎在预示着人类命运的脆弱……