暂无英文版的简介，请添加内容帮助我们完善数据库。

暂无英文版的简介，请添加内容帮助我们完善数据库。

暂无剧情简介

"A boy who lived life at full speed meets a girl who moves slowly — and experiences spring for the first time." Se-jin (17) is rushed and restless. Ha-yun is unhurried and warm. Paired together for morning cleaning duty, they wipe the classroom windows side by side every day. At first, they find each other's pace unbearable, but gradually, they begin to change through one another. Then one day, Ha-yun stops coming to school. Left alone, Se-jin listens to a radio message she sent. The slowest time they shared turns out to be the most meaningful.

暂无英文版的简介，请添加内容帮助我们完善数据库。

Salaryman K spends a bizarre day with a skull that has emerged from his own body.

暂无剧情简介

仍然延续着“神”的血脉的土地——珍岛，以及逐渐被遗忘的珍岛巫俗传统“堂걸”。外家是珍岛人的国文大学研究生“明姬”，自然而然地对巫俗有着浓厚的兴趣，她正在研究世代以巫业为家业的世袭巫人“堂걸”。接到找到能成为重要资料的“堂걸板”的联络后，她匆忙前往珍岛，但却屡屡受骗。她逐渐深入到封闭的珍岛巫俗世界，追寻着“堂걸”的踪迹。然而，随着接近“堂걸板”的真相，不祥的气息愈发浓重，在巫女“必顺菩萨”和“春熙”的引导下，“明姬”陷入了如噩梦般的混乱之中……

여전히 ‘신’의 명맥이 이어지는 땅, 진도 그리고 잊혀 가는 진도의 무속 전통, ‘당골’ 외가가 진도 출신으로, 자연스럽게 무속에 관심이 깊은 국문학 대학원생 ‘명길’은 집안 대대로 무업(巫業)을 가업으로 삼는 세습무인 ‘당골’을 연구하고 있다. 중요한 사료가 될 ‘당골판’을 찾았다는 연락에 한달음에 진도로 향하지만 번번이 허탕을 치고, 그녀는 폐쇄적인 진도의 무업 세계를 점점 더 깊숙이 파고들며 ‘당골’의 흔적을 쫓는다. 그러나 ‘당골판’의 진실에 다가갈수록 불길한 기운은 짙어져 가고, 무당 ‘필순보살’과 ‘춘희’의 손길에 이끌려 ‘명길’은 악몽 같은 혼돈 속으로 빠져들게 되는데…

The film begins with a belief: prostitution should disappear. It then turns to Yongjugol, a red-light district in Paju, where the closure of the area has sparked protests. Who are the people opposing its closure? Beyond familiar images of "crime scenes" and "brainwashed victims," Yongjugol is home to many different lives. Sex workers, activists, queer people, people living with mental illness, and other marginalized communities gather to declare that "life cannot be shut down." Even as they chant the same slogan, they remain strangers to one another. They resist easy definitions, and so do the relationships they form. As connections emerge, they develop their own strategies for protecting their lives from their respective positions. Their struggle invites us to reconsider the realities behind policies that seek to close red-light districts in the name of "women's rights."