"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

历史上第一部互动电影（interactive movie），观众可以通过按手中的红绿按钮来投票选择后面的剧情。1967年蒙特利尔世博会上捷克馆的一大看点。影片同时也是贯穿着捷克电影新浪潮的主题。

Documenting Horn & Hardart's iconic Automat, one of America's original and most popular restaurant chins in NYC & Philadelphia.

本影集由勇夺金球奖和英国电影电视艺术学院的瑞奇吉瓦斯和史蒂芬莫彻特执导。 　　你可曾遇到过自认为最风趣的老板？你可曾因为和某位按部就班的同事共事而让你苦不堪言？你又可曾偷偷地暗恋某人？而你又是如何告诉对方你的感受呢？ 　　办公室笑云是部真实揭露上班族生活的幽默喜剧，随着经理大卫布兰特以及他的部署，看他们如何努力打拼和玩乐，面对喜怒哀乐，展开恋情，以及表演结合闪舞和MC哈默的舞姿！从大卫受训日的带动唱，到最后终曲的圣诞派对，每个经典镜头都能让你难以忘怀。 　　办公室笑云在推出两个系列加上圣诞特别版后，可说是重新改写当代喜剧的定义，绝对是上班族必看的影集。

本影集由勇夺金球奖和英国电影电视艺术学院的瑞奇吉瓦斯和史蒂芬莫彻特执导。 　　你可曾遇到过自认为最风趣的老板？你可曾因为和某位按部就班的同事共事而让你苦不堪言？你又可曾偷偷地暗恋某人？而你又是如何告诉对方你的感受呢？ 　　办公室笑云是部真实揭露上班族生活的幽默喜剧，随着经理大卫布兰特以及他的部署，看他们如何努力打拼和玩乐，面对喜怒哀乐，展开恋情，以及表演结合闪舞和MC哈默的舞姿！从大卫受训日的带动唱，到最后终曲的圣诞派对，每个经典镜头都能让你难以忘怀。 　　办公室笑云在推出两个系列加上圣诞特别版后，可说是重新改写当代喜剧的定义，绝对是上班族必看的影集。

Download Links 　　http://rapidshare.com/files/112117437/Urz_d.avi

Download Links 　　http://rapidshare.com/files/112117437/Urz_d.avi

在某公司上班的金丙国科长将自己的家人残忍的杀害后返回公司，随后去向不明，而他的手下职员也开始一个个接连被害...该片入围了第68届戛纳国际电影节。

在某公司上班的金丙国科长将自己的家人残忍的杀害后返回公司，随后去向不明，而他的手下职员也开始一个个接连被害...该片入围了第68届戛纳国际电影节。