"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

历史上第一部互动电影（interactive movie），观众可以通过按手中的红绿按钮来投票选择后面的剧情。1967年蒙特利尔世博会上捷克馆的一大看点。影片同时也是贯穿着捷克电影新浪潮的主题。

Documenting Horn & Hardart's iconic Automat, one of America's original and most popular restaurant chins in NYC & Philadelphia.

“Continued explorations of automatism as a practical guide to negotiating the mysterious zone where light and no-light flutter in a fecund equipoise. A homemade rocket to realms unknown to any movie camera or photo lens. In the end, perhaps nothing more than a search for an experience of continuity, a kind of sanity. Failing sanity, a wild ride at least.”

公元5012年。 突然降临地球的“外星人”，以及他们创造的“机械生命体”，让人类陷入了灭绝的危机。 极少数人类逃到月球上，为了夺回地球，开始了使用“人造人”士兵的反攻作战。 但是，面对能无限增殖的机械生命体，战况陷入了僵局。 最终，人类派遣最终兵器，新型人造人“寄叶”部队前往地球。 公元11945年。 “第243次空降行动”开始实施，新加入寄叶部队的“2B”和”9S”被派往地球。 最终，他们成功消灭了机械生命体的主干单位“亚当”及“夏娃”。 “人类军”认为这是歼灭敌人，终结漫长战争的好机会，于是命令对机械生命体发动总攻。 这是被命运操纵的人造人们留下的战斗与愿望的记录——

The Wishing Machine is a Czech children's film, bestowing top billing upon juvenile actor Milan Zeman. Two youngsters dream about being the first children on the moon. They are given an opportunity to make their dreams come true by way of the magic machine of the title. The special effects aren't anything to write home about, but the film's enthusiasm is contagious. The Wishing Machine is one of several foreign films released in a single package to local TV outlets.

这部奇幻剧是改编自漫画《披着狼皮的羊》讲述网文作家赖晓光无意之间进入名为“上帝之手”的虚拟世界，在这里她变成了狼人大牛，并不得不和羊旺财一起调查国宝失窃案的故事。

狂飙突进而又循规蹈矩，或许这就是我们所身处的时代。我们眼见着人设取代了个性，立场取代了观点，情绪取代了思考，话语狂欢取代了真诚表达。 　　这样的时代，可以留下些什么？我们又能为这个时代留下些什么？ 　　在过去的一段时间里，我们在乌镇、北京、嵩县、武汉分别对话了陈丹青、许知远、阎连科、戴建业，制作成4期视频。 　　那些有关自我与时代的问题，他们要怎么回答？1月29日起，真诚相遇，陆续会面。