"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

Documenting Horn & Hardart's iconic Automat, one of America's original and most popular restaurant chins in NYC & Philadelphia.

历史上第一部互动电影（interactive movie），观众可以通过按手中的红绿按钮来投票选择后面的剧情。1967年蒙特利尔世博会上捷克馆的一大看点。影片同时也是贯穿着捷克电影新浪潮的主题。

历史上第一部互动电影（interactive movie），观众可以通过按手中的红绿按钮来投票选择后面的剧情。1967年蒙特利尔世博会上捷克馆的一大看点。影片同时也是贯穿着捷克电影新浪潮的主题。

Documenting Horn & Hardart's iconic Automat, one of America's original and most popular restaurant chins in NYC & Philadelphia.

财政部的一位职员在办公室里接受了贿赂。下班回到家后，他跟妻子吵了一架，妻子威胁说要离开他。第二天，他上班时发现自己被拒绝进入办公室，一个男人说自己讨厌行贿受贿之类的事情。那位职员打道回府，发现痛不欲生的妻子企图结束自己的生命。

财政部的一位职员在办公室里接受了贿赂。下班回到家后，他跟妻子吵了一架，妻子威胁说要离开他。第二天，他上班时发现自己被拒绝进入办公室，一个男人说自己讨厌行贿受贿之类的事情。那位职员打道回府，发现痛不欲生的妻子企图结束自己的生命。

一部480分钟的纪录片，记录了中国独立音乐的变迁，波澜壮阔，涉及中国社会几代人的演变与冲突。 　　在二十一世纪第二个十年中叶的中国，奥运会都已过去了十个年头，物质与文明极速涌入了当下的时代，多样化的生活方式，令时代舞台上的人们变得前所未有的不同起来，保守、前卫、焦虑、大胆，越来越不被理解——不被别人理解，也互相不理解。 　　一趟已经在河东行驶了三十年的时代巴士，早已失去了政治光环，艺术家、个体户、工作者，形形色色，上上下下，构成了这部公路电影；而窗外更稚嫩的年轻人，焦急地排着队向这个时代涌来……他们可能会登上某一趟巴士，或者砸了所有的巴士。 　　A 480-minute documentary, a historical record of the change of independent music across China, mammoth and complete, involving evolution and conflicts of several generations in Chinese society. 　　In the second decade of the 21 century, it has been ten years since the Beijing Olympics. China has seen the abundance of wealth and civilization. Facing such a diverse lifestyles, people are far more different from each other than ever. Conservative, avant-garde, worried, daring, they not only fail to be understood, but also fail to understand one another. 　　The film is a driving bus of our times, which has already lost its political halo in 30-years glory history, filled with artists, businessmen, workers and all different people who get in and off, however, the innocent younger generation is still queuing up anxiously outside, who might get in one of the buses, or smash all buses.