勤劳质朴的大学毕业生江南开了一间小卖铺，为了给女友苏晴雪更好的生活一直努力奋斗，却被苏晴雪告知，他只是苏晴雪心中男神赵坤的替代品，现在赵坤留学归来，因此要与江南分手。江南悲痛之下发现自己小卖铺中竟然有一个能连接现实世界和末日世界的虫洞，为了帮助末世难民，江南将自己小卖铺中的方便面、面包等食物带入末日世界，从而得到了末世首富周大福、末世医仙药无双的真诚感谢，实现了财富自由，他也因此认识了李氏集团总裁李美静，凭借质朴谦逊的性格，俘获李美静芳心，被李美静追求。

马楚成之后还会开发“攻略”系列，下部是《美洲攻略》

马楚成之后还会开发“攻略”系列，下部是《美洲攻略》

主人公华县皮影戏老艺人——老杨头，崇拜中国传统文化中的孙悟空人物；另一主人公是美国的小男孩——布鲁克斯，则崇拜西洋文化中的蜘蛛侠。其中一条主线是，布鲁克斯父母当作为志愿者赴西藏可可西里参加藏羚羊保护行动时，委托老杨头照顾小洋人布鲁克斯，期间老杨头和布鲁克斯在生活习惯、语言形式、行为思维以及文化观念等方面的相互排斥、对立，经过曲折的碰撞和相互之间的包容、接纳以及人性化的关爱，最终变对立为友情，老杨头和布鲁克斯成为老少朋友，体现了中西文化的合璧；另一条主线是，镇文化站站长请缨老杨头出阵，以师带徒传承保护华县皮影戏，因老杨头曾在“文革”中受过冲击，回避担当此任，经过站长的苦口婆心努力和生动的典型说教，老杨头最终接受了任务，办起了皮影戏和皮影雕刻艺术短训班。布鲁克斯在老杨头的熏陶下，也喜欢中国华县的皮影戏和皮影雕刻，老杨头在布鲁克斯将要返回美国的时候，还特意为他精心雕刻了一个蜘蛛侠模样的皮影，作为礼品赠送，至此剧情圆满结束。

主人公华县皮影戏老艺人——老杨头，崇拜中国传统文化中的孙悟空人物；另一主人公是美国的小男孩——布鲁克斯，则崇拜西洋文化中的蜘蛛侠。其中一条主线是，布鲁克斯父母当作为志愿者赴西藏可可西里参加藏羚羊保护行动时，委托老杨头照顾小洋人布鲁克斯，期间老杨头和布鲁克斯在生活习惯、语言形式、行为思维以及文化观念等方面的相互排斥、对立，经过曲折的碰撞和相互之间的包容、接纳以及人性化的关爱，最终变对立为友情，老杨头和布鲁克斯成为老少朋友，体现了中西文化的合璧；另一条主线是，镇文化站站长请缨老杨头出阵，以师带徒传承保护华县皮影戏，因老杨头曾在“文革”中受过冲击，回避担当此任，经过站长的苦口婆心努力和生动的典型说教，老杨头最终接受了任务，办起了皮影戏和皮影雕刻艺术短训班。布鲁克斯在老杨头的熏陶下，也喜欢中国华县的皮影戏和皮影雕刻，老杨头在布鲁克斯将要返回美国的时候，还特意为他精心雕刻了一个蜘蛛侠模样的皮影，作为礼品赠送，至此剧情圆满结束。

杨昊梦回太雍皇朝，五度穿梭生死局，智勇双全逆天改命，力挽狂澜救皇室于危难！

《重生崛起从仙女下凡开始》讲述了一个普通人因赌博而失去家庭的悲剧，但在重生后，他决心改变命运，守护家人。他凭借智慧和勇气，努力工作、勤奋学习，成功摆脱了赌博的恶习。他赢得了家人的理解和社会的尊重，最终成为了一位成功人士，为社会做出了贡献。这个故事激励人们面对困难时坚持努力，相信自己能够改变命运，实现梦想。

纪录片将带您深入探索美洲大陆——地球上唯一横跨南北两极的广袤陆地。影片将全景展现美洲令人叹为观止的自然奇观、鲜为人知的生态奥秘与脆弱的生命网络，讲述那些不为人知的野生动物传奇，引发全球亿万观众的深刻共鸣。

Three young men from the Savannah of Niger leave their homeland to seek wealth and adventure on the coast and in the cities of Ghana. This film is the story of their travels, their encounters along the way, their experiences in Accra and Kumasi, and, after three months, their return to their families and friends at home. The film is part documentary, part fiction, and part reflective commentary. There was no portable sound synchronized equipment in the early 1950s when Jaguar was shot. Instead, Rouch had the main characters (his friends and "accomplices") improvise a narrative while they viewed the film, which was itself improvized along the way. The resulting soundtrack consists of remembered dialogue, of joking and exclamations, of questions and explanations about the action on the screen. 　　 　　Short-term, rural migration to the cities is common to much of contemporary Africa. Here we meet Lam the herdsman, Illo the fisherman and Damoure, their unsettled but literate friend. The three trek for more than a month south through Dahomey to Ghana, crossing the land of the Somba people (whose nudity shocks them), eating coconuts "more delicious than cheese," and delighting in the ocean with its waves and starfish. Eventually they part ways. Damoure and Illo go to Accra and Lam to Kumasi, where they find jobs as dockworker, foreman for a lumberman, and cattleherder for a city butcher. Having made their separate journeys, they meet again in Kumasi with a fourth friend, and set up an open-air stall, Petit a Petit, in which they hawk everything from alarm clocks to pictures of Queen Elizabeth. 　　 　　Financially successful but homesick, the friends decide to leave the excitement, turmoil and bewildering complexity of the city to return home to Niger before the rains. Lam rejoins his herd, enriched with a new umbrella and a lance; Illo, "magician of the river," catches a hippo and distributes everything he has brought from his journey to his family; and Damoure admires anew the beauty of Niger women. 　　 　　Yet although life in the village resumes as usual, Illo, Lam and Damoure have been "jaguars" in the city: sophisticated "keen young men" with fancy hairdos, cigarettes, sunglasses, money, and knowledge of the urban world. The film raises, but does not answer, questions about the meaning of this experience and the transformations it may entail in the lives of the returned youths. Jaguar, Thomas Beidelman has written, "does succeed in catch ing the flavor of what it must be like to pass to and from a modern city and a rural village in Africa . . . jaguar could be an eloquent document on the process of social change." 　　 　　The flavor, it might be added, is very gay. Rouch has pointed out that jaguar does not attempt to reveal the misery and pain of the annual migration, or the boredom of village life in the dry season (eight months of the year) when young men, no longer warriors as in the past, have nothing to do. Few men, in actuality, become "jaguars" in the carefree style of Damoure, Lam, and Illo. For most, the city is a struggle. Yet jaguar is nonetheless a vivid portrayal of the ideal of migration, a fantasy imparted through the improvised actions and spirited commentary of the characters. In this film Rouch has developed a form one might call "ethnographic fantasy," with an authenticity and reality as important, although quite different, from that of Rouch's own monograph on rural migration to Accra.

Three young men from the Savannah of Niger leave their homeland to seek wealth and adventure on the coast and in the cities of Ghana. This film is the story of their travels, their encounters along the way, their experiences in Accra and Kumasi, and, after three months, their return to their families and friends at home. The film is part documentary, part fiction, and part reflective commentary. There was no portable sound synchronized equipment in the early 1950s when Jaguar was shot. Instead, Rouch had the main characters (his friends and "accomplices") improvise a narrative while they viewed the film, which was itself improvized along the way. The resulting soundtrack consists of remembered dialogue, of joking and exclamations, of questions and explanations about the action on the screen. 　　 　　Short-term, rural migration to the cities is common to much of contemporary Africa. Here we meet Lam the herdsman, Illo the fisherman and Damoure, their unsettled but literate friend. The three trek for more than a month south through Dahomey to Ghana, crossing the land of the Somba people (whose nudity shocks them), eating coconuts "more delicious than cheese," and delighting in the ocean with its waves and starfish. Eventually they part ways. Damoure and Illo go to Accra and Lam to Kumasi, where they find jobs as dockworker, foreman for a lumberman, and cattleherder for a city butcher. Having made their separate journeys, they meet again in Kumasi with a fourth friend, and set up an open-air stall, Petit a Petit, in which they hawk everything from alarm clocks to pictures of Queen Elizabeth. 　　 　　Financially successful but homesick, the friends decide to leave the excitement, turmoil and bewildering complexity of the city to return home to Niger before the rains. Lam rejoins his herd, enriched with a new umbrella and a lance; Illo, "magician of the river," catches a hippo and distributes everything he has brought from his journey to his family; and Damoure admires anew the beauty of Niger women. 　　 　　Yet although life in the village resumes as usual, Illo, Lam and Damoure have been "jaguars" in the city: sophisticated "keen young men" with fancy hairdos, cigarettes, sunglasses, money, and knowledge of the urban world. The film raises, but does not answer, questions about the meaning of this experience and the transformations it may entail in the lives of the returned youths. Jaguar, Thomas Beidelman has written, "does succeed in catch ing the flavor of what it must be like to pass to and from a modern city and a rural village in Africa . . . jaguar could be an eloquent document on the process of social change." 　　 　　The flavor, it might be added, is very gay. Rouch has pointed out that jaguar does not attempt to reveal the misery and pain of the annual migration, or the boredom of village life in the dry season (eight months of the year) when young men, no longer warriors as in the past, have nothing to do. Few men, in actuality, become "jaguars" in the carefree style of Damoure, Lam, and Illo. For most, the city is a struggle. Yet jaguar is nonetheless a vivid portrayal of the ideal of migration, a fantasy imparted through the improvised actions and spirited commentary of the characters. In this film Rouch has developed a form one might call "ethnographic fantasy," with an authenticity and reality as important, although quite different, from that of Rouch's own monograph on rural migration to Accra.