「我们感谢华盛顿邮报、纽约时报、时代周刊和其他大出版社的主管们，谢谢你们参加我们的会议，并在差不多四十年的时间里信守诺言，为我们分散注意力，如果在公开的情况下成为公众的焦点，那么我们制定给这个世界的那些计划将不可能实施。但是，现在的世界已经变得更加成熟，并且已经准备好向一个世界政府迈进了。一个由智力精英和世界银行家连手统治的、超越国度的主权，无疑比过去几个世纪里各个国家自制的制度更加可取。」 　　－戴维．洛克菲勒　1991年在一个三边委员会会议上的一段演说 　　“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” 　　~ David Rockefeller in an address to Trilateral Commission meeting, 1991 　　. 　　http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/atlantean_conspiracy/atlantean_conspiracy16.htm 　　http://www.moneyasdebt.net/

「我们感谢华盛顿邮报、纽约时报、时代周刊和其他大出版社的主管们，谢谢你们参加我们的会议，并在差不多四十年的时间里信守诺言，为我们分散注意力，如果在公开的情况下成为公众的焦点，那么我们制定给这个世界的那些计划将不可能实施。但是，现在的世界已经变得更加成熟，并且已经准备好向一个世界政府迈进了。一个由智力精英和世界银行家连手统治的、超越国度的主权，无疑比过去几个世纪里各个国家自制的制度更加可取。」 　　－戴维．洛克菲勒　1991年在一个三边委员会会议上的一段演说 　　“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” 　　~ David Rockefeller in an address to Trilateral Commission meeting, 1991 　　. 　　http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/atlantean_conspiracy/atlantean_conspiracy16.htm 　　http://www.moneyasdebt.net/

这是《债务货币（Money As Debt / 钱就是债）》的第三部曲，保持原有的一贯论调，从一开始分析问题的本质，从最基本最简化的问题着手，慢慢纳入现实世界中的变因，再重新分析原问题，找出新的问题，不断的往核心之处挖掘，试图找出货币在我们世界上的特殊状况。在这部同时也讨论到目前炙手可热的话题，也就是回归金本位或是银本位，甚至是任何硬商品本位的问题，让我们来看看这影片，并思考，要如何解决目前货币滥发的问题根源。 》

The follow-up to the original "Money as Debt", which explained the origins of the modern day "fractional reserve system" and modern banking. This follow-up focuses on more modern-day banking and the effect the money supply has on the economy. Produced in 2008 and released in 2009, you will be amazed at just how well this film predicted our current (2011) financial crisis. 　　Both films may sound incredibly dull, but the producers explain things using simple cartoon characters and animated diagrams to keep you interested. While the quality of the static cartoons and animation in both films is quite poor, you don't watch a film like this expecting Fantasia. 　　If you are into history & politics, you will find this sequel almost as fascinating as the first. My only criticism: This sequel does repeat the myth that "it took World War II to finally pull us out of the Great Depression"... a surprising economic blunder for such a detailed film (if war provides such an economic boom, explain the fact the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have had a devastating economic effect on the U.S. today?) But once you get past that huge blunder, the remainder is quite accurate. 　　Fascinating to the point of horrifying, "Money as Debt II" is nearly every bit as good as the original.

The follow-up to the original "Money as Debt", which explained the origins of the modern day "fractional reserve system" and modern banking. This follow-up focuses on more modern-day banking and the effect the money supply has on the economy. Produced in 2008 and released in 2009, you will be amazed at just how well this film predicted our current (2011) financial crisis. 　　Both films may sound incredibly dull, but the producers explain things using simple cartoon characters and animated diagrams to keep you interested. While the quality of the static cartoons and animation in both films is quite poor, you don't watch a film like this expecting Fantasia. 　　If you are into history & politics, you will find this sequel almost as fascinating as the first. My only criticism: This sequel does repeat the myth that "it took World War II to finally pull us out of the Great Depression"... a surprising economic blunder for such a detailed film (if war provides such an economic boom, explain the fact the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have had a devastating economic effect on the U.S. today?) But once you get past that huge blunder, the remainder is quite accurate. 　　Fascinating to the point of horrifying, "Money as Debt II" is nearly every bit as good as the original.

这是《债务货币（Money As Debt / 钱就是债）》的第三部曲，保持原有的一贯论调，从一开始分析问题的本质，从最基本最简化的问题着手，慢慢纳入现实世界中的变因，再重新分析原问题，找出新的问题，不断的往核心之处挖掘，试图找出货币在我们世界上的特殊状况。在这部同时也讨论到目前炙手可热的话题，也就是回归金本位或是银本位，甚至是任何硬商品本位的问题，让我们来看看这影片，并思考，要如何解决目前货币滥发的问题根源。 》

现存相关的研究报告和可核查的证据指出我们的经济和金融体系中的97%表现出存在着严重的问题。这是第一个从英国的角度来解决这个问题的纪录片，并解释了中央银行的内部运作和货币创造过程。当金钱驱使地球上几乎所有的活动，我们必须理解它。然而，简单的问题往往被忽视，像这样的问题；钱从何而来？谁创造了它？谁决定如何使用？那么，当货币和金融体系崩溃时，数百万普通民众的痛苦又意味着什么呢？

现存相关的研究报告和可核查的证据指出我们的经济和金融体系中的97%表现出存在着严重的问题。这是第一个从英国的角度来解决这个问题的纪录片，并解释了中央银行的内部运作和货币创造过程。当金钱驱使地球上几乎所有的活动，我们必须理解它。然而，简单的问题往往被忽视，像这样的问题；钱从何而来？谁创造了它？谁决定如何使用？那么，当货币和金融体系崩溃时，数百万普通民众的痛苦又意味着什么呢？

这部纪录片探讨了高速增长的国家债务将会给美国和它的公民带来什么样的影响。永远扩张的政府机构和军队、永无休止的国际竞赛以及过分增加的福利计划，使得美国目前支付着大量的资金以保证这些项目的正常运转。当战后出生的婴儿潮一代退休并开始获取高额的社会保障金时，美国经济将会陷入到一个大灾难中。

这部纪录片探讨了高速增长的国家债务将会给美国和它的公民带来什么样的影响。永远扩张的政府机构和军队、永无休止的国际竞赛以及过分增加的福利计划，使得美国目前支付着大量的资金以保证这些项目的正常运转。当战后出生的婴儿潮一代退休并开始获取高额的社会保障金时，美国经济将会陷入到一个大灾难中。