四个即将毕业的农大学生，满怀理想踏上创业之路，不切实际的想法。盲目的投资创业失败。经过反思，四人决定回农村施展自己的才华和抱负，经历许多的挫折和困难最终走向了成功。虽说只是梦境，但他们找到了奋斗的方向。

四个即将毕业的农大学生，满怀理想踏上创业之路，不切实际的想法。盲目的投资创业失败。经过反思，四人决定回农村施展自己的才华和抱负，经历许多的挫折和困难最终走向了成功。虽说只是梦境，但他们找到了奋斗的方向。

继2003年《If You Were Me》后，再次找来五位导演各自拍摄以人权为中心的故事。由对歧视的误解、对于政治的探讨，以致因为歧视而引来的社会话题，虽然每个故事的话题与角度不同，不过却一针见血，讽刺时弊。

继2003年《If You Were Me》后，再次找来五位导演各自拍摄以人权为中心的故事。由对歧视的误解、对于政治的探讨，以致因为歧视而引来的社会话题，虽然每个故事的话题与角度不同，不过却一针见血，讽刺时弊。

一位班主任之死。

一位班主任之死。

作品大胆，详实的揭露了日本医学界的阴暗面，比如不是自己值班的就不救病人；没人时医生在CT室睡觉；动手术看谁快赌钱；总之黑暗得你不敢相信。在争鸣和对抗中，控诉了日本社会的片面性，虚伪性和一些不公平，不合理的世情。 　　剧中织田裕二饰演反派医生，医技高明的他一切唯利是图，有钱就能把病人医好，而与他对立的石黑贤却是个古道热肠以救人命为职志的善良医生，两人因对生命的体验和认知不同，经常对立，直到石黑贤得了胃癌，织田裕二才动了人性真情，正义还是战胜了自私自利。

作品大胆，详实的揭露了日本医学界的阴暗面，比如不是自己值班的就不救病人；没人时医生在CT室睡觉；动手术看谁快赌钱；总之黑暗得你不敢相信。在争鸣和对抗中，控诉了日本社会的片面性，虚伪性和一些不公平，不合理的世情。 　　剧中织田裕二饰演反派医生，医技高明的他一切唯利是图，有钱就能把病人医好，而与他对立的石黑贤却是个古道热肠以救人命为职志的善良医生，两人因对生命的体验和认知不同，经常对立，直到石黑贤得了胃癌，织田裕二才动了人性真情，正义还是战胜了自私自利。

In As You See, Farocki searches for those instances and facts in the history of technology that have been overlooked or ignored, also exploring the ambivalent relationship between technologies developed for civil use and those designed for military purposes. 　　Thus the film for instance describes how in the 1970's workers at the British arms factory Lucas Aerospace attempted to develop socially useful products to replace the company's military output. 　　Rather than following a linear argument, this essay-film juxtaposes disparate images and weaves them into a mosaic-like structure which makes it possible for the viewers to make their own connections between the different images as well as between the images and the commentary.

In As You See, Farocki searches for those instances and facts in the history of technology that have been overlooked or ignored, also exploring the ambivalent relationship between technologies developed for civil use and those designed for military purposes. 　　Thus the film for instance describes how in the 1970's workers at the British arms factory Lucas Aerospace attempted to develop socially useful products to replace the company's military output. 　　Rather than following a linear argument, this essay-film juxtaposes disparate images and weaves them into a mosaic-like structure which makes it possible for the viewers to make their own connections between the different images as well as between the images and the commentary.