老邓 （吕中饰）在青年时代响应国家号召到贵阳支援建设。回到北京后，老邓与两个儿子回归平淡生活。然而一系列意外出现的人和事打破了老邓一家的平静：家中时不时响起的沉默来电，屡次“碰巧”遇见、让老邓感到似曾相识的陌生少年，小区里发生难解的谋杀悬案，似乎将有一场翻云覆雨的风暴正向老邓和她的家人们袭来。老邓串起眼前发生的一系列离奇事件，在贵阳的记忆逐渐在她眼前浮现。为了寻找答案，也为了当年的遗憾，她踏上了去贵阳的旅程，而在那里，另一重意外也在等待着她 。

老邓 （吕中饰）在青年时代响应国家号召到贵阳支援建设。回到北京后，老邓与两个儿子回归平淡生活。然而一系列意外出现的人和事打破了老邓一家的平静：家中时不时响起的沉默来电，屡次“碰巧”遇见、让老邓感到似曾相识的陌生少年，小区里发生难解的谋杀悬案，似乎将有一场翻云覆雨的风暴正向老邓和她的家人们袭来。老邓串起眼前发生的一系列离奇事件，在贵阳的记忆逐渐在她眼前浮现。为了寻找答案，也为了当年的遗憾，她踏上了去贵阳的旅程，而在那里，另一重意外也在等待着她 。

In the aftermath of a deadly haunting in a small suburban home, a sinister omnipresent entity proceeds to cause havoc in the private lives of a young boy, an unsuspecting teen, and absent minded inspector.

In the aftermath of a deadly haunting in a small suburban home, a sinister omnipresent entity proceeds to cause havoc in the private lives of a young boy, an unsuspecting teen, and absent minded inspector.

《闯入者》讲述了一个关于冲突和危险的故事。乔凡娜经营着一家课后中心，照顾贫困的孩子。生活在这样的环境下，许多家庭担心的都是安全问题。一天，玛丽亚和她的两个孩子来到中心避难，并请求乔凡娜保护。很快，乔丹娜发现玛丽亚把她的中尉丈夫藏在屋里，而她的丈夫是卡莫拉组织的一员。尽管乔凡娜被玛丽亚骗了，但当玛利亚的丈夫被捕时，她依然拒绝驱逐玛丽亚一家……

Rebecca and Sam’s lives are turned upside down when two teenagers break into their coast home.

Rebecca and Sam’s lives are turned upside down when two teenagers break into their coast home.

丁伟国、皮熊和黄玫瑰躲过了公安人员的迫捕，越过国境，躲了起来。吕丽有个可爱的女儿娜娜，然而她的丈夫铁成是一个只有事业心却不顾家的人。纪云深爱着吕丽，他不愿与吕丽继续过情人生活，又一次来到吕丽家提出重组家庭的想法。正当吕丽犹豫不定时，突然传来敲门声，吕丽以为是铁成回来了，一把将纪云推入立柜。丁伟国三人强行拥入屋内。纪云从柜子中偷看，被皮熊和黄玫瑰顶住了脑袋。丁伟国看了墙上的全家福后，明白了两人的关系。丁命纪云戴着他的帽子到电影院对面的电话亭外坐等一个叫侯三虎的人，纪云为了吕丽只得从命。吕丽从电视中播放的有关追捕丁伟国的情况，明白了自己的处境。一名警官将丁伟国的行踪报告给赵川科长。赵川马上布置警力，紧盯侯三虎。纪云为了吕丽的安全，最终没有报警。为保护吕丽等人的安全，赵川答应丁伟国的要求，撤走部队，亲自开车到达楼下。铁成和纪云共同商定要保护好吕丽和娜娜。汽车驶向玉灵崖。赵川被皮熊击昏；丁命匪徒干掉铁成。苏醒后的赵川开枪射击，铁成也拾起匪徒的枪参加战斗。吕丽用身体挡住了射向丈夫的子弹，倒在铁成怀中。丁伟国被赵川等武警擒获，吕丽却永远地离开了丈夫和爱她的纪云。

In English, “trespass” means to intrude, but it could also be an unauthorized entry, or in legal jargon, a “domestic disturbance.” trespass, Paul Wenninger’s ten-minute real-animation film plays with all of these meanings in a technically impressive, varied, and precise tour de force. A consistent element throughout is a type of avatar of the director, a character created from real images, whom the film sends on a world journey, of sorts, within his own four walls. The penetration of the outside world is both abrupt and varied: whereas the strange, inert main figure with his jerky movements initially seems isolated in the bare dungeon of a green-painted cell, all at once, windows are inserted in this monad—to use the terminology of the philosopher Leibniz. A wild process of transgression can now begin. Not only does an excess of “world” suddenly appear in the cell windows, but the entire background, from which the character is set-off, is filled with profuse images of the most distant scenes in Eritrea, Brussels, Helsinki, Vienna, and France. The “backdrops” change and tumble into one another, as though by mouse click, which hardly affords the thoroughly stationary protagonist a hold. Although he maneuvers through and deals with a seemingly endless assortment of everyday objects, he still remains imprisoned in a cell-like existence. In the end, he must attend his own death and the slow draining of his blood—paint that mutates to blood and then back to paint again. The “intrusion” from outside is thus subjected to a paradoxical twist: it is not the world, another life, a foreign power that can suddenly be felt in the here and now, but instead, despite all of its animation and dynamics, the character’s own vitality is increasingly “divested” as the film progresses. trespass hereby brings to bear a clever, visually enchanting subject-object reversal—moving beyond, even moving beyond oneself, which for the longest time, one seems to perceives as an invasion from the outside. (Christian Höller)

In English, “trespass” means to intrude, but it could also be an unauthorized entry, or in legal jargon, a “domestic disturbance.” trespass, Paul Wenninger’s ten-minute real-animation film plays with all of these meanings in a technically impressive, varied, and precise tour de force. A consistent element throughout is a type of avatar of the director, a character created from real images, whom the film sends on a world journey, of sorts, within his own four walls. The penetration of the outside world is both abrupt and varied: whereas the strange, inert main figure with his jerky movements initially seems isolated in the bare dungeon of a green-painted cell, all at once, windows are inserted in this monad—to use the terminology of the philosopher Leibniz. A wild process of transgression can now begin. Not only does an excess of “world” suddenly appear in the cell windows, but the entire background, from which the character is set-off, is filled with profuse images of the most distant scenes in Eritrea, Brussels, Helsinki, Vienna, and France. The “backdrops” change and tumble into one another, as though by mouse click, which hardly affords the thoroughly stationary protagonist a hold. Although he maneuvers through and deals with a seemingly endless assortment of everyday objects, he still remains imprisoned in a cell-like existence. In the end, he must attend his own death and the slow draining of his blood—paint that mutates to blood and then back to paint again. The “intrusion” from outside is thus subjected to a paradoxical twist: it is not the world, another life, a foreign power that can suddenly be felt in the here and now, but instead, despite all of its animation and dynamics, the character’s own vitality is increasingly “divested” as the film progresses. trespass hereby brings to bear a clever, visually enchanting subject-object reversal—moving beyond, even moving beyond oneself, which for the longest time, one seems to perceives as an invasion from the outside. (Christian Höller)