Filled with expectations, Etienne moves to Paris from Lyon to study film directing at the Sorbonne. He leaves behind his girlfriend Lucie, promising to call her regularly via Skype. On his course he meets Jean-Noël and Mathias, they too have come to the metropolis from smaller cities and share his passion for cinema. Together they discuss the cinematic canon, read texts by Flaubert and Pasolini, and listen to Bach and Mahler. Jean-Noël proves to be an agreeable friend who tries to strengthen Etienne’s fragile self-confidence; Mathias, on the other hand, often comes across as stern, aloof and mysterious. Fond of arguing, he has a habit of disappearing for weeks on end without the others knowing where he is. Nobody gets to see his student film, either. Etienne is particularly crestfallen when he discovers by chance that Mathias shares a secret with Annabelle, an idealistic young woman who lives in Etienne’s shared flat and with whom he is secretly in love. Jean Paul Civeyrac’s tenderly melancholic black-and-white study of these young people’s encounter with art and life is at the same time a declaration of love for classic cinema and the city of Paris.

Filled with expectations, Etienne moves to Paris from Lyon to study film directing at the Sorbonne. He leaves behind his girlfriend Lucie, promising to call her regularly via Skype. On his course he meets Jean-Noël and Mathias, they too have come to the metropolis from smaller cities and share his passion for cinema. Together they discuss the cinematic canon, read texts by Flaubert and Pasolini, and listen to Bach and Mahler. Jean-Noël proves to be an agreeable friend who tries to strengthen Etienne’s fragile self-confidence; Mathias, on the other hand, often comes across as stern, aloof and mysterious. Fond of arguing, he has a habit of disappearing for weeks on end without the others knowing where he is. Nobody gets to see his student film, either. Etienne is particularly crestfallen when he discovers by chance that Mathias shares a secret with Annabelle, an idealistic young woman who lives in Etienne’s shared flat and with whom he is secretly in love. Jean Paul Civeyrac’s tenderly melancholic black-and-white study of these young people’s encounter with art and life is at the same time a declaration of love for classic cinema and the city of Paris.

艾薇和豆豆报了芭蕾舞课，却发现她们要在数百人面前演出。要赶快逃跑才行！

玛格丽特·杜拉斯 谈论她的作品“写作”，纪录片，时长43分钟，彩色，video。

女大学生安吉拉（安娜·托伦特 Ana Torrent 饰）正在撰写一篇关于视听暴力的论文，她的教授在为她收集资料的时候心脏病突发死亡。安吉拉觉得事有蹊跷，偷偷从案发现场拿走了教授死亡前正在看的一卷录像带。切玛（费雷·马丁内兹 Fele Martínez 饰）对暴力录像研究颇深，安吉拉带着录像带向他求助。他告诉安吉拉，其中录制的惨绝人寰的暴力行径为真实拍摄，并且受害者很可能就是他们失踪已久的校友凡妮莎。 　　为了得到真相，安吉拉和切玛四处奔波渐渐产生了感情。他们找到了凡妮莎的男友博斯克（爱德华多·诺列加 Eduardo Noriega 饰），没想到博斯克却把矛头指向了切玛。夹在两个男人之间的安吉拉究竟应该相信谁？一个小小的细节暴露了全部真相，当恶魔展现出他的真正面目，“天使”安吉拉还能够幸免于难吗？

29岁的冈扎罗刚刚结束了在国外的留学生涯，之后进入了布宜诺斯艾利斯大学继续深造，由于父亲的缘故，他与其导师贝穆德之间的关系十分亲近。尽管贝穆德对于冈扎罗的某些激进思想不敢苟同，但他不得不承认，冈扎罗的才华和聪敏在他漫长的执教生涯中所见不多。 一宗残酷而又恶劣的奸杀案的发生吸引了冈扎罗和贝穆德的注意，冈扎罗决定将调查此案的过程作为撰写论文的材料。贝穆德也在调查此案，但随着时间的推移，他渐渐开始产生了怀疑，怀疑犯下这宗案件的罪魁祸首正是冈扎罗本人，而他的动机，不过只是为了证明自己的观点。

一个偶然的午后，于亮平遇到了一个叫“扳手”的神秘女子，此后他们以及于亮平的妻子，余妮三个人的关系产生了微妙的变化

《树木写作颂》是由Jessye Wdowin-McGregor创作的“视频诗”，与著名诗人、小说家、学者、编辑和翻译家欧阳昱（Ouyang Yu）合作完成。该作品反思了欧阳昱长期以来在澳大利亚墨尔本东北郊的布杜拉公园（Bundoora Park）树干和树叶上写诗的日常实践。布杜拉公园是一个大型开放的公园，是欧阳昱近三十年来不断回访的灵感来源地。 　　该作品是在2023年“Correspondences”（墨尔本，澳大利亚）的合作艺术家驻地项目期间创作的，该项目由Emma Thomson策展。视频中所朗读和书写的诗歌均来自欧阳昱，除了两首古代中国诗歌——分别是王之涣的《登鹳雀楼》和李白的《静夜思》。王之涣的诗《登鹳雀楼》/“White Sun”出现在树上，欧阳昱朗读李白的诗《静夜思》/“Thoughts on a Still Night”。注：上述诗歌的标题由欧阳昱翻译。

“Continued explorations of automatism as a practical guide to negotiating the mysterious zone where light and no-light flutter in a fecund equipoise. A homemade rocket to realms unknown to any movie camera or photo lens. In the end, perhaps nothing more than a search for an experience of continuity, a kind of sanity. Failing sanity, a wild ride at least.”

1984 PISMAK / WRITE AND FIGHT (screenplay by Wladyslaw Terlecki based on his own novel) - Set in a prison during World War I, the film centers on a journalist who aspires to be a writer and is imprisoned with a safe-robber and a monk. His cellmates appear to him to be the perfect topic for a novel. Critic Jan Slodowki described the film as "a study in isolation told through the three voices of three people condemned to be with each other; among them, the writer, a maturing artist, his gaze fixed on himself, proves the central figure."