该片又名《跟我谈谈爱》或《亲密爱人》

该片又名《跟我谈谈爱》或《亲密爱人》

这不是……你应该说的…… 你总是把女人带回家…… Jeong-soo 和女朋友分手后，他的成绩远没有提高，所以他的父亲给他找了一个家教 Yoo-jin。 走吧，去你的房间学习。 Jeong-soo 认为 Yoo-jin 只是他父亲众多女人中的一员，她对他很友善。 普通的爱……像其他人一样…… Jeong-soo 不擅长普通的爱情，他从 Yoo-jin 那里获得了特别的体验。 当他们越来越近，他感觉有些东西在他心中挥之不去……

百闻不如一见!不是老师，而是女学生的特别课程开始了。美珍高中时期曾是蔡英课外老师的，虽然他的课外辅导能力是一流的，但在性方面，他必须接受弟子蔡英的特别辅导。蔡英优柔寡断的男朋友在民让他尝试各种各样的女人经验，让他和美珍的相遇也不错，但是与美珍的宿敌也小且没有经验的在民则不一样。与妈妈想让她代替就业而结婚的想法不同，彩瑛堂堂正正地发泄自己的欲望，享受着日常生活。给彩瑛带来更好的活动的美珍老师。美珍拜托彩瑛进一步学习刺激，有一天彩瑛向美珍提出了隐秘的提案。和自己交往的年长的男朋友在观战俱乐部里过了一夜...现在两个女人的欲望变得越来越无法控制……

改编自Nancy Doyne的小说。讲述一对夫妻去做婚姻咨询，咨询师朱迪·斯莫尔虽然看着很可靠，但心怀黑暗和矛盾，她操纵了夫妻俩，导致两人产生矛盾，婚姻濒临破裂。夏希饰演Annabelle，夫妻中的丈夫Bob的会计同事，离异、举止挑逗。

Petra and Kerstin – two ladies in their prime – are sitting at the therapist when the lights go off. The therapist leaves, the ladies stay. They came to let off some steam, so they do. Alone in the dark and in a quite novel way. 　　For relationship problems, a bit of Fresh Air Therapy can be just the thing: let it all out, and then laugh. (Mel Pritchard, LSF Hamburg 2010)

Petra and Kerstin – two ladies in their prime – are sitting at the therapist when the lights go off. The therapist leaves, the ladies stay. They came to let off some steam, so they do. Alone in the dark and in a quite novel way. 　　For relationship problems, a bit of Fresh Air Therapy can be just the thing: let it all out, and then laugh. (Mel Pritchard, LSF Hamburg 2010)

山西卫视全新生活服务类法律咨询节目《顶级咨询》由超模李艾担纲主持，邀请四位国内知名律师担任顶级律师团，为到场求助人提供最权威、最专业的法律服务，解决困扰求助人的各种法律问题。

Kiarostami presents two cases for talking heads to evaluate in terms of morality, rights and responsibilities. Case One: Your son is in class, sitting in the back row. His teacher is writing on the board. A restless student in the back row makes a lot of noise. Not knowing who the culprit is, the teacher makes all the children sitting in the last two rows stay outside of the class until the weekend, unless they tell him who made the noise. After a few days spent outside of the classroom, your son relents and tattles on the boy who made the noise, so he can go back in and continue learning. Was he in the right? Case Two: The other students from the back row wait out the rest of the week outside of the class, before returning. Were they in the right?

Kiarostami presents two cases for talking heads to evaluate in terms of morality, rights and responsibilities. Case One: Your son is in class, sitting in the back row. His teacher is writing on the board. A restless student in the back row makes a lot of noise. Not knowing who the culprit is, the teacher makes all the children sitting in the last two rows stay outside of the class until the weekend, unless they tell him who made the noise. After a few days spent outside of the classroom, your son relents and tattles on the boy who made the noise, so he can go back in and continue learning. Was he in the right? Case Two: The other students from the back row wait out the rest of the week outside of the class, before returning. Were they in the right?