北京卫视第四季主打“成长季”，大型亲子观察纪实节目《幼儿缘》，讲述了中国家庭在养育下一代时的一些特殊情感故事及遇到的育儿难题。

北京卫视第四季主打“成长季”，大型亲子观察纪实节目《幼儿缘》，讲述了中国家庭在养育下一代时的一些特殊情感故事及遇到的育儿难题。

外科医生张嘉儿（刘心悠 饰）和Jessica、Amy是从小在孤儿院长大的好姐妹，走上社会后她们依然住在一起，亲密无间。某天，嘉儿接到律师的信，信中说她在马来西亚的嫲嫲（鲍起静 饰）不久前离世，身后留给嘉儿一栋大宅作为遗产。小时候嘉儿在马来西亚住过，可是当她来到香港后却几乎忘记以前的事了。几经犹豫，嘉儿决定带着两个好友一同前往大马。在律师的安排下，三人来到了嫲嫲这栋古色古香的房子。 　　一切手续看起来十分顺利，可是诡异恐怖的事件接二连三地发生了。嫲嫲不在的房子里，似乎有什么东西四处游走，而嘉儿失落已久的记忆也渐渐恢复……

外科医生张嘉儿（刘心悠 饰）和Jessica、Amy是从小在孤儿院长大的好姐妹，走上社会后她们依然住在一起，亲密无间。某天，嘉儿接到律师的信，信中说她在马来西亚的嫲嫲（鲍起静 饰）不久前离世，身后留给嘉儿一栋大宅作为遗产。小时候嘉儿在马来西亚住过，可是当她来到香港后却几乎忘记以前的事了。几经犹豫，嘉儿决定带着两个好友一同前往大马。在律师的安排下，三人来到了嫲嫲这栋古色古香的房子。 　　一切手续看起来十分顺利，可是诡异恐怖的事件接二连三地发生了。嫲嫲不在的房子里，似乎有什么东西四处游走，而嘉儿失落已久的记忆也渐渐恢复……

日常生活でありえないシチュエーションを設定し、人々がどのような行動を取るのか観察する。さまざまなアングルで設置された隠しカメラで記録されたVTRを紹介していく。 　　なお、当番組の開始前に、同様の内容の特番『日本中でニンゲン観察こんな時…アナタならどうする!?大実験SP』が2012年9月12日の19:00 - 20:49に放送された。この番組にベッキーも出演した。 　　2013年3月27日までは、TBSと一部の地域では毎週水曜日24:20 - 24:50に放送されていた。 　　2013年4月25日より現在の時間（ゴールデンタイム）に進出した。

Set up strange situations for random people to experience, and monitor how they react to them.

Immediately after the Boston Marathon bombing in April 2013, amateur detectives took to internet chat rooms to try and find the culprits. Users on reddit, 4chan, and other gathering spots poured over photographs uploaded to the sites, looking for any detail that might point to the guilt of potential suspects. Using texts and jpegs culled from these investigations, Watching the Detectives narrates the process of crowd sourcing culpability.

老张、Tomás和少天是中国一家大型公司的海外员工。 他们驻扎在秘鲁，合租一套四居室公寓。 COVID-19 在南美洲爆发，根据当地防疫政策与总公司海外管理条例，他们被限制在公寓内不得外出。公司通过宿舍内的安全监控持续监管员工日常生活行为。 　　与此同时，就在秘鲁宣布封国之前，，Tomás的表弟小韩以游客的身份来到首都利马，暂借住在宿舍中。 由于秘鲁封国事发突然，小韩也被困在公寓里无法离开。然而让所有人始料未及的是，秘鲁的疫情迅速恶化，成为全球疫情最严重地区之一，禁闭时间从最开始的两周逐渐延长至数月之久，解封遥遥无期。小韩在这无休止的禁闭生活中目睹了一系列事件的发生，最终走向悲惨但不可避免的结局…

Kiarostami presents two cases for talking heads to evaluate in terms of morality, rights and responsibilities. Case One: Your son is in class, sitting in the back row. His teacher is writing on the board. A restless student in the back row makes a lot of noise. Not knowing who the culprit is, the teacher makes all the children sitting in the last two rows stay outside of the class until the weekend, unless they tell him who made the noise. After a few days spent outside of the classroom, your son relents and tattles on the boy who made the noise, so he can go back in and continue learning. Was he in the right? Case Two: The other students from the back row wait out the rest of the week outside of the class, before returning. Were they in the right?

Kiarostami presents two cases for talking heads to evaluate in terms of morality, rights and responsibilities. Case One: Your son is in class, sitting in the back row. His teacher is writing on the board. A restless student in the back row makes a lot of noise. Not knowing who the culprit is, the teacher makes all the children sitting in the last two rows stay outside of the class until the weekend, unless they tell him who made the noise. After a few days spent outside of the classroom, your son relents and tattles on the boy who made the noise, so he can go back in and continue learning. Was he in the right? Case Two: The other students from the back row wait out the rest of the week outside of the class, before returning. Were they in the right?