「設計思考」是當下設計界和企業界同樣熱門討論的一個話題, 近年由美國知名公司 IDEO 所引爆,提倡左右腦並進的企業模式,也將人性關懷及創意發想帶進創業與決策的大雅之堂。設計思考的理念和用途, 當前在美國備受爭議, 而本片的出現客觀呈現各界對設計思考的正反意見, 將能帶來更多的省思。

「設計思考」是當下設計界和企業界同樣熱門討論的一個話題, 近年由美國知名公司 IDEO 所引爆,提倡左右腦並進的企業模式,也將人性關懷及創意發想帶進創業與決策的大雅之堂。設計思考的理念和用途, 當前在美國備受爭議, 而本片的出現客觀呈現各界對設計思考的正反意見, 將能帶來更多的省思。

讲述德国重要的哲学流派——法兰克福学派的思想内容和历史。由3sat推出。

讲述德国重要的哲学流派——法兰克福学派的思想内容和历史。由3sat推出。

妊娠という、他人との体の共有。冷徹なメスの肉体に、思いは引きずられていく。どこまでが“私”なのか、本当の“私”はどこにいるのか・・・。妊娠、出産という体験を対象化し、作者自身の存在が日々撮り続けられた映像を通して語られていく。それは、新しい自分の「誕生」を見届ける試みでもあった。 　　【竹藤佳世】 　　映像作家集団「パウダールーム」主宰。『骨肉思考』（1999年）で、イメージフォーラム・フェスティバル98一般公募部門大賞受賞、『SPIRAL WORLD』（2000年）で、めんこいデジタルコンテンツグランプリ2000大賞受賞。 若松孝ニ監督『17歳の風景』『実録・連合赤軍』のメイキング、河瀬直美監督『垂乳女-Tarachime』『殯の森』の監督助手等を経て、長編監督第一作『半身反義』（2007年）が劇場公開。あいち国際女性映画祭・ロッテルダム国際映画祭（オランダ）ほか各地の映画祭でも上映された。最新作はアーティストあがた森魚のドキュメンタリー『あがた森魚 ややデラックス』（2009年）。

妊娠という、他人との体の共有。冷徹なメスの肉体に、思いは引きずられていく。どこまでが“私”なのか、本当の“私”はどこにいるのか・・・。妊娠、出産という体験を対象化し、作者自身の存在が日々撮り続けられた映像を通して語られていく。それは、新しい自分の「誕生」を見届ける試みでもあった。 　　【竹藤佳世】 　　映像作家集団「パウダールーム」主宰。『骨肉思考』（1999年）で、イメージフォーラム・フェスティバル98一般公募部門大賞受賞、『SPIRAL WORLD』（2000年）で、めんこいデジタルコンテンツグランプリ2000大賞受賞。 若松孝ニ監督『17歳の風景』『実録・連合赤軍』のメイキング、河瀬直美監督『垂乳女-Tarachime』『殯の森』の監督助手等を経て、長編監督第一作『半身反義』（2007年）が劇場公開。あいち国際女性映画祭・ロッテルダム国際映画祭（オランダ）ほか各地の映画祭でも上映された。最新作はアーティストあがた森魚のドキュメンタリー『あがた森魚 ややデラックス』（2009年）。

“The cinematic spectacle has its rules, which enable one to produce satisfactory products. But dissatisfaction is the reality that must be taken as a point of departure. Whether dramatic or documentary, the cinema functions to present a false, isolated coherence as a substitute for communication and an activity that are absent. To demystify documentary cinema it is necessary to dissolve what is called its subject matter.” In this fascinating, seminal anti-film, Guy Debord articulates in full flesh his situationist manifesto, superimposing subtitles and a documentary-style commentary on a catalog of newsreel footage, book covers, rephotographed photographs, views of Paris’ neighborhoods, and seemingly candid footage of him and his friends in wandering between cafes and the street. Whereas the conventions of narrative fictional film would oblige us to separate the filmmaker Debord from both the voice of the film’s commentary and from the “character” played by Debord, a man in his late twenties pursuing a young girl who appears to be no more than seventeen. (源自: TIDF 2024)

“The cinematic spectacle has its rules, which enable one to produce satisfactory products. But dissatisfaction is the reality that must be taken as a point of departure. Whether dramatic or documentary, the cinema functions to present a false, isolated coherence as a substitute for communication and an activity that are absent. To demystify documentary cinema it is necessary to dissolve what is called its subject matter.” In this fascinating, seminal anti-film, Guy Debord articulates in full flesh his situationist manifesto, superimposing subtitles and a documentary-style commentary on a catalog of newsreel footage, book covers, rephotographed photographs, views of Paris’ neighborhoods, and seemingly candid footage of him and his friends in wandering between cafes and the street. Whereas the conventions of narrative fictional film would oblige us to separate the filmmaker Debord from both the voice of the film’s commentary and from the “character” played by Debord, a man in his late twenties pursuing a young girl who appears to be no more than seventeen. (源自: TIDF 2024)

BACKGROUND 　　Xu Tong is a documentary director. His work “Wheat Harvest”, was opposed by a small group of people for violating the privacy of sexual workers and copyright, ironically, these complaints help to let more people to know and watch this film. 　　WuHaoHao failed to film Xu Tong and used his materials about such incident as he couldn't get the copyright. Throughout the process of production, he criticized himself, the society, documentary format by deconstructing video, sound and text he got when he interview Xu Tong. Like using paper cutting, or his individual voice over to repeat the interview. 　　CONCEPT 　　The way the director criticizing documentary format by deconstructing the video, sound and text of his interview with Xu Tong inspired me to deconstruct all the Chinese characters for all the titles on the poster. 　　背景 　　徐童，紀錄片導演，他的作品《麥收》因涉及侵權與偷拍性工作者而引起小範圍反對，但諷刺地，這卻讓更多的人關注此片。 　　吳昊昊因未能得到徐童的允許，在製作該視頻作品中，所以他只能利用剪紙，或用個人旁白來重複訪問內容等方式製作。他解構視頻、聲音、文字的同時，發現原來也在批判自己、社會、和記錄片。 　　概念 　　海報的設計概念來自導演透過對紀錄片的視頻，聲音，文字，不斷解構而進行批判的這個行為，故海報中全部標題的漢字都被分拆，解構。

BACKGROUND 　　Xu Tong is a documentary director. His work “Wheat Harvest”, was opposed by a small group of people for violating the privacy of sexual workers and copyright, ironically, these complaints help to let more people to know and watch this film. 　　WuHaoHao failed to film Xu Tong and used his materials about such incident as he couldn't get the copyright. Throughout the process of production, he criticized himself, the society, documentary format by deconstructing video, sound and text he got when he interview Xu Tong. Like using paper cutting, or his individual voice over to repeat the interview. 　　CONCEPT 　　The way the director criticizing documentary format by deconstructing the video, sound and text of his interview with Xu Tong inspired me to deconstruct all the Chinese characters for all the titles on the poster. 　　背景 　　徐童，紀錄片導演，他的作品《麥收》因涉及侵權與偷拍性工作者而引起小範圍反對，但諷刺地，這卻讓更多的人關注此片。 　　吳昊昊因未能得到徐童的允許，在製作該視頻作品中，所以他只能利用剪紙，或用個人旁白來重複訪問內容等方式製作。他解構視頻、聲音、文字的同時，發現原來也在批判自己、社會、和記錄片。 　　概念 　　海報的設計概念來自導演透過對紀錄片的視頻，聲音，文字，不斷解構而進行批判的這個行為，故海報中全部標題的漢字都被分拆，解構。