分手后，一位处于困境中的电影导演被他的心理治疗师所吸引，而他的前女友在面对自我认同和未来方向时陷入了困惑。

讲述德国重要的哲学流派——法兰克福学派的思想内容和历史。由3sat推出。

讲述德国重要的哲学流派——法兰克福学派的思想内容和历史。由3sat推出。

《性／生活》讲述了一个女人、她的丈夫以及她的旧情人之间的三角恋故事，采用全新的视角审视了女性的身份和欲望。

《性／生活》讲述了一个女人、她的丈夫以及她的旧情人之间的三角恋故事，采用全新的视角审视了女性的身份和欲望。

The 60 minute video for Madonna's Sex book is a great work of art. It's like seeing the book come alive as it's almost in every location. There is no talking in this film just 1920's music and Madonna is absolutely beautiful. Very rare to find now in days it's a must have for a every Madonna fan but the quality more than likely will be terrible due to the number of times copying. 　　The video shows Madonna nude most of the time laying on her back against the ocean, riding a bicycle, dancing with Naomi Campbell and kissing and horsing around with then boyfriend Vanilla Ice. It's a lovely companion for the book. Very artistic and creative. 　　Remember this film was never released only given by Madonna to 100 of her closest friends at the Sex Book release party. Somehow the video got out and might be on sell on Ebay time and time again.

“The cinematic spectacle has its rules, which enable one to produce satisfactory products. But dissatisfaction is the reality that must be taken as a point of departure. Whether dramatic or documentary, the cinema functions to present a false, isolated coherence as a substitute for communication and an activity that are absent. To demystify documentary cinema it is necessary to dissolve what is called its subject matter.” In this fascinating, seminal anti-film, Guy Debord articulates in full flesh his situationist manifesto, superimposing subtitles and a documentary-style commentary on a catalog of newsreel footage, book covers, rephotographed photographs, views of Paris’ neighborhoods, and seemingly candid footage of him and his friends in wandering between cafes and the street. Whereas the conventions of narrative fictional film would oblige us to separate the filmmaker Debord from both the voice of the film’s commentary and from the “character” played by Debord, a man in his late twenties pursuing a young girl who appears to be no more than seventeen. (源自: TIDF 2024)

“The cinematic spectacle has its rules, which enable one to produce satisfactory products. But dissatisfaction is the reality that must be taken as a point of departure. Whether dramatic or documentary, the cinema functions to present a false, isolated coherence as a substitute for communication and an activity that are absent. To demystify documentary cinema it is necessary to dissolve what is called its subject matter.” In this fascinating, seminal anti-film, Guy Debord articulates in full flesh his situationist manifesto, superimposing subtitles and a documentary-style commentary on a catalog of newsreel footage, book covers, rephotographed photographs, views of Paris’ neighborhoods, and seemingly candid footage of him and his friends in wandering between cafes and the street. Whereas the conventions of narrative fictional film would oblige us to separate the filmmaker Debord from both the voice of the film’s commentary and from the “character” played by Debord, a man in his late twenties pursuing a young girl who appears to be no more than seventeen. (源自: TIDF 2024)

BACKGROUND 　　Xu Tong is a documentary director. His work “Wheat Harvest”, was opposed by a small group of people for violating the privacy of sexual workers and copyright, ironically, these complaints help to let more people to know and watch this film. 　　WuHaoHao failed to film Xu Tong and used his materials about such incident as he couldn't get the copyright. Throughout the process of production, he criticized himself, the society, documentary format by deconstructing video, sound and text he got when he interview Xu Tong. Like using paper cutting, or his individual voice over to repeat the interview. 　　CONCEPT 　　The way the director criticizing documentary format by deconstructing the video, sound and text of his interview with Xu Tong inspired me to deconstruct all the Chinese characters for all the titles on the poster. 　　背景 　　徐童，紀錄片導演，他的作品《麥收》因涉及侵權與偷拍性工作者而引起小範圍反對，但諷刺地，這卻讓更多的人關注此片。 　　吳昊昊因未能得到徐童的允許，在製作該視頻作品中，所以他只能利用剪紙，或用個人旁白來重複訪問內容等方式製作。他解構視頻、聲音、文字的同時，發現原來也在批判自己、社會、和記錄片。 　　概念 　　海報的設計概念來自導演透過對紀錄片的視頻，聲音，文字，不斷解構而進行批判的這個行為，故海報中全部標題的漢字都被分拆，解構。

BACKGROUND 　　Xu Tong is a documentary director. His work “Wheat Harvest”, was opposed by a small group of people for violating the privacy of sexual workers and copyright, ironically, these complaints help to let more people to know and watch this film. 　　WuHaoHao failed to film Xu Tong and used his materials about such incident as he couldn't get the copyright. Throughout the process of production, he criticized himself, the society, documentary format by deconstructing video, sound and text he got when he interview Xu Tong. Like using paper cutting, or his individual voice over to repeat the interview. 　　CONCEPT 　　The way the director criticizing documentary format by deconstructing the video, sound and text of his interview with Xu Tong inspired me to deconstruct all the Chinese characters for all the titles on the poster. 　　背景 　　徐童，紀錄片導演，他的作品《麥收》因涉及侵權與偷拍性工作者而引起小範圍反對，但諷刺地，這卻讓更多的人關注此片。 　　吳昊昊因未能得到徐童的允許，在製作該視頻作品中，所以他只能利用剪紙，或用個人旁白來重複訪問內容等方式製作。他解構視頻、聲音、文字的同時，發現原來也在批判自己、社會、和記錄片。 　　概念 　　海報的設計概念來自導演透過對紀錄片的視頻，聲音，文字，不斷解構而進行批判的這個行為，故海報中全部標題的漢字都被分拆，解構。