The third of the short films on the Best v Best Vol 2 DVD that I watched made me think that perhaps I am doomed to be on the outside looking in with all the films. I say this because Wayfarers just cracked on into what it wanted to do without really giving me anything to help me come along with it. With other films this was a minor issue but here it was a big one. A ten minute look around the grounds and patients within some sort of home for the mentally challenged is fine and it was reasonably interesting but the approach meant it was never more than that. 　　I saw the people and the place but never felt anything for them or understood the wider aim of the film. Is this home part of a bigger failure in Ukraine to deal with the needy of society? I have no idea and, despite having watched this film, still have no idea. Visually the film is great. I really liked the black and white and enjoyed the mix of mobile shots, candid shots and portrait-like, silent frames of the people. It helps it a lot although the failure in the material cannot be redeemed solely by this strength. 　　Overall then, stylistically an interesting film but one where it cries out for context and some sort of help for the audience. For viewers who are aware of the bigger picture or of the relevance, this may prove touching but for myself it was well put together and sadly nothing more than that.

The third of the short films on the Best v Best Vol 2 DVD that I watched made me think that perhaps I am doomed to be on the outside looking in with all the films. I say this because Wayfarers just cracked on into what it wanted to do without really giving me anything to help me come along with it. With other films this was a minor issue but here it was a big one. A ten minute look around the grounds and patients within some sort of home for the mentally challenged is fine and it was reasonably interesting but the approach meant it was never more than that. 　　I saw the people and the place but never felt anything for them or understood the wider aim of the film. Is this home part of a bigger failure in Ukraine to deal with the needy of society? I have no idea and, despite having watched this film, still have no idea. Visually the film is great. I really liked the black and white and enjoyed the mix of mobile shots, candid shots and portrait-like, silent frames of the people. It helps it a lot although the failure in the material cannot be redeemed solely by this strength. 　　Overall then, stylistically an interesting film but one where it cries out for context and some sort of help for the audience. For viewers who are aware of the bigger picture or of the relevance, this may prove touching but for myself it was well put together and sadly nothing more than that.

张建斌夫妇生活在上世纪末的东北，是普通的工薪阶层。为了让家庭有更光明的未来，夫妻俩各自努力着。可时代的一粒沙，落在每个普通人的头上，都是一座山。在命运的渡口，张建斌只能选择随波逐流。

在一本高中的历史书上画满了各种各样的涂鸦。一天放学后，历史书上的涂鸦活了过来，并拥有自己的意志，就此开始了自己穿梭遨游于中华古文明千年历史长河当中的旅程，一路上穿过了中国古时的各个朝代，见证了各个时期的历史

新传媒97年度大制作之一，由新传媒最佳情侣拍档郑惠玉及李南星领衔主演。两人在剧中的演出精湛，富有默契而再次擦出火花。本剧在制作上下足重本，拉队远赴风景独特的土耳其进行拍摄。故事描述三名一同在新加坡河边长大的好友，如何互相扶持成长，经历了生活的磨练。最后三人因名利与爱情而反目成仇。这部剧情变化莫测以及充满浪漫异国风情的激情剧，一经播出深受观众追捧。

张建斌夫妇生活在上世纪末的东北，是普通的工薪阶层。为了让家庭有更光明的未来，夫妻俩各自努力着。可时代的一粒沙，落在每个普通人的头上，都是一座山。在命运的渡口，张建斌只能选择随波逐流。

在一本高中的历史书上画满了各种各样的涂鸦。一天放学后，历史书上的涂鸦活了过来，并拥有自己的意志，就此开始了自己穿梭遨游于中华古文明千年历史长河当中的旅程，一路上穿过了中国古时的各个朝代，见证了各个时期的历史

新传媒97年度大制作之一，由新传媒最佳情侣拍档郑惠玉及李南星领衔主演。两人在剧中的演出精湛，富有默契而再次擦出火花。本剧在制作上下足重本，拉队远赴风景独特的土耳其进行拍摄。故事描述三名一同在新加坡河边长大的好友，如何互相扶持成长，经历了生活的磨练。最后三人因名利与爱情而反目成仇。这部剧情变化莫测以及充满浪漫异国风情的激情剧，一经播出深受观众追捧。

映像作家の宇治茶が監督・脚本・編集・キャラクターデザイン・作画・撮影を1人で担当し、アニメーションと劇画を融合させた「ゲキメーション」という表現方法を用いて完成させた異色長編アニメ。日本の山奥の村に暮らすアメリカ人少年のボビーは、数少ない友人であるあっくんと猫のデレクを連れ、遊びに出かける。その道すがら、娯楽施設「バイオレンス・ボイジャー」と書かれた看板を発見し、施設に足を踏み入れるボビーたち。そこで彼らが出会った少女・時子は、数日前からここから出られずにいるという。さらに、先客として迷い込んでいた村の子どもたちは、謎の白スーツを着た子どもの襲撃を受け、次々と捕獲されてしまう。時子の救出と復讐のために、ボビーたちが立ち上がるが……。ボビーの声を「魔法少女まどか☆マギカ」の悠木碧が担当するほか、「ココリコ」の田中直樹、「サバンナ」の高橋茂雄、田口トモロヲらが声優として参加。ナレーションを松本人志が務める。