Marcel Proust, Une vie d'écrivain, un documentaire réalisé pour la télévision américaine (1992). Entretiens avec des figures littéraires d'outre-atlantique comme l'historien Shelby Foote ou le poète Roger Shattuck et témoignages de personnes ayant fréquenté Proust, dont Céleste, sa gouvernante au cours des 7 dernières années de Marcel Proust. Céleste Albaret, qui, comme à son habitude, occulte totalement le rôle primordial de Reynaldo Hahn dans la vie de Marcel Proust. Ce documentaire évoque des composantes majeures de la galaxie proustienne : l'influence maternelle, l'affaire Dreyfus, pour laquelle il se passionna (il prit ardemment position en faveur de la révision), le goût des mondanités, la guerre de 14-18, la temporalité ou l'homosexualité. La réalisatrice Sarah Mondale évoque ces différents thèmes en s'attardant sur les carnets raturés, tachés et dessinés, l'écriture nerveuse. NB: la photo de Marcel Proust montrée au début du reportage ne date pas de 1913, mais de 1895.

Le Bosphore 　　de Maurice Pialat 　　France/1962/14'/35 mm 　　À l'opposé d'Istanbul, qui présente la vie de la ville, ce film évoque le passé superposé de la ville (Byzance, Constantinople, Istanbul), en présentant différents sites et monuments.(0227 Maurice Pialat - Courts métrages turcs)

这是流行的情景喜剧Punky Brewster的动画版。当年曾在央视周末六点半黄金时间档播出，但时间很短，所以即便是很多生于七十年代生的朋友，也对此片印象不深了。主人公庞姬是一个脸上长着雀斑的小姑娘，一次她偶遇一个不可思议的毛茸茸的生物，就像传说中的森林小矮人，名字叫Glommer。Glommer是一个来自童话世界的精灵，和伙伴们住在彩虹尽头的内部……

二流棒球运动员蒙弟，当他最穷困潦倒时，舅父的三亿美元遗产从天而降，只要他在一个月内先将三千万美元花掉就可继承，于是种种五花八门的花钱方法陆续粉墨登场。本片的故事犹如一个现代童话，对现代人的金钱观念进行了嘲讽，其中最有意思的一段，是蒙弟一掷千金参加纽约州长竟选，但竟选标语却是“谁也不要选"，对金钱贿赂选举的丑恶现象讽刺鞭挞得淋漓尽致。

This is not the end of the Cocteau story, of course, for as we have constantly witnessed, he is always oriented towards the future due to his undimmed faith in the creative act, and none more so than in the medium of film. Indeed, he was even more advanced in his preparations for death and the after-life of his work than originally thought. 　　Just a couple of months before his death, in August 1963, he made one last film: a 25-minute short entitled Jean Cocteau s’adresse à l’an 2000 (Cocteau addresses the year 2000). The film comprises one still and highly sober shot of Cocteau facing the camera head-on to address the youth of the future. Once recorded, this spoken message for the 21st century was wrapped up, sealed and posted on the understanding that it would be opened only in the year 2000 (as it turned out, it was discovered and exhumed a few years shy of that date). If in The Testament Cocteau portrays himself as a living anachronism, a lonesome classical modernist loitering in space-time in the same buckskin jacket and tie while lost in the spectral light of his memories, here he acknowledges explicitly the irony of his phantom-like state: by the time the viewer sees this image, he, J. C., our saviour Poet, will long be dead. 　　Temporality is typically skewed: speaking from both 1963 and 2000 Cocteau is at once nostalgic for the present that will have passed and prophetic about the future. There is thus both a documentary aspect and projective thrust to the film, another new configuration of ‘superior realism’ and fantasy enhanced by Cocteau’s seamless performance as himself and his now ‘immortal’ status as a member of the Académie Française. He reiterates some of his long-standing artistic themes and principles: death is a form of life; poetry is beyond time and a kind of superior mathematics; we are all a procession of others who inhabit us; errors are the true expression of an individual, and so on. The tone is at once speculative and uncompromising, as when Cocteau pours vitriolic scorn on the many awards bestowed upon him, which he calls ‘transcendent punishments’. He also revels in the fact that he can say now what he likes with absolute freedom and impunity since he will not be around to suffer the consequences. 　　The status of Jean Cocteau s’adresse à l’an 2000 remains ultimately unclear. Is it a new testament or confession, or a heroic demonstration of the need for human endurance, or a pure ‘farce of anti-gravitation’ as he puts it? Or everything at once? It is entirely characteristic of Cocteau to leave us hanging on this suspended paradox. What is certain, however, and what we have consistently seen, is that Cocteau’s life and body are his work, and his work in turn is always mysteriously alive. This is Cocteau’s final gift to his fellow human beings. Let us retain and celebrate the force of that gesture. He is resurrected before our eyes, ever-present, defiant and joyfully queer. 　　Jean Cocteau is dead, long live Cocteau! 　　(James S. Williams)

歪心狼被Acme产品负了太多次，长期追逐BB鸟而不得，遂请了律师（威尔·福特 饰）将Acme集团告上法庭，并对上了律师那令人畏惧的前老板（约翰·塞纳 饰）。此后，人类与卡通角色逐渐发展出友谊，更加坚定了要打赢官司的决心。

歪心狼被Acme产品负了太多次，长期追逐BB鸟而不得，遂请了律师（威尔·福特 饰）将Acme集团告上法庭，并对上了律师那令人畏惧的前老板（约翰·塞纳 饰）。此后，人类与卡通角色逐渐发展出友谊，更加坚定了要打赢官司的决心。

讲述极富魅力的同性恋民权活动家贝亚·鲁斯丁克服重重阻碍，通过组织1963年的华盛顿大游行，改变了美国历史进程的故事。

讲述极富魅力的同性恋民权活动家贝亚·鲁斯丁克服重重阻碍，通过组织1963年的华盛顿大游行，改变了美国历史进程的故事。

波鲁斯是目前为止投入最昂贵的印度电视剧。 　　故事发生在公元前350年，当时印度因其财富而被称为Sone Ki Chidiya。市场上的黄金、银色、祖母绿和宝石都在露天交易。这也是第一次袭击印度土地的时候，袭击者不是别人，正是亚历山大大帝。Poru s国王是抵抗亚力山大袭击的强大力量。虽然他输掉了Jhelum河上的战争，但他在精神上打败了亚历山大军队，看到了亚力山大返回希腊。故事讲述了从波鲁斯出生在帕拉瓦拉吉亚到巴马尼和安努苏亚的那一天，亚力山大则是马其顿的菲利普和奥林匹亚斯之子。尽管两人出生在同一天，但他们的教养却大不相同。一个成为世界上最伟大的征服者，另一个成为印度人最伟大的捍卫者。这场表演为印度和希腊历史带来了栩栩如生的人物。它将展示不同的世界，这是叙事的关键。还有特别强调的服装，发型，武器和纹身，将定义的外观和感觉的节目。