圭子、冴子の姉妹の家は海苔業者だが、二人は家計を助けるために、川崎にある漁網会社に圭子は会計課、冴子は女工として働いていた。冴子は同じ職場にいる駒倉という真面目な職工に関心を持っていたが、圭子も駒倉と知り合いと知って、駒倉と圭子との結婚を願って二人の間を何かととり持っていた。その圭子には縁談が持上っていた、海苔組合長の息子である。圭子の両親は組合からの借金があるため、何とかこの話をまとめたがっていた。こんな時に、圭子の前に松本が現われた。松本は、昔圭子の家に出入りしていたかつぎ屋だが、今ではある会社の課長になっていた。松本は、美しく成長した圭子に惹かれ、積極的に彼女に接近した。松本と圭子のデートが何回かくり返された。圭子は松本の豪華な暮しにだんだんと傾いていった。そんな圭子に冴子は反発した、姉が貧乏に負けてほしくなかった。駒倉は安月給だからだ。冴子は圭子の気持を駒倉に戻そうとしたが、圭子は駒倉とのデートを断りつづけた。駒倉が愛情を告白しても、みじめな生活はしたくないと答え、母親が重病のため岡山へ帰郷するという松本に、圭子は同行することを承諾した。これを聞いた冴子は姉を激しくなじり、また松本に会って姉を諦めるように頼んだが無駄だった。圭子は松本と岡山へ発った。「駒倉さん、どうしてお姉ちゃんをしっかりつかまえておかなかったの……」行きつけのおでん屋で酔っている駒倉に、涙を流しながらいう冴子の言葉は、駒倉を愛しているからこそ口に出る言葉だった。おでん屋の女将は「冴子さん、あんた本当は駒倉さんが好きだったのね。……あんたの恋愛はこれから始るんだわ。いい男を見つけなさい。大きな目をあいてね」と、優しくいたわるのだった。

深夜，因为各自的理由而无法入睡的四个男女，帮我们演绎了关于年轻的灵魂，悸动的心情，青涩而真挚的爱恋。

深夜，因为各自的理由而无法入睡的四个男女，帮我们演绎了关于年轻的灵魂，悸动的心情，青涩而真挚的爱恋。

深夜，因为各自的理由而无法入睡的四个男女，帮我们演绎了关于年轻的灵魂，悸动的心情，青涩而真挚的爱恋。

本作は、地方から上京して東京都内の大学に通う女性・藤井彩と澤田花蓮が主人公の物語。一人ぼっちの彩がある青年と出会って学内探検をする様子や、花蓮が図書館で目にしたメッセージ「過去は変えられない H」を書いた人物を突き止めようとする姿が切り取られる。

本作は、地方から上京して東京都内の大学に通う女性・藤井彩と澤田花蓮が主人公の物語。一人ぼっちの彩がある青年と出会って学内探検をする様子や、花蓮が図書館で目にしたメッセージ「過去は変えられない H」を書いた人物を突き止めようとする姿が切り取られる。

1969年，33岁的未来名监督 若松孝二（井浦新），热衷于粉红电影的制作，此时，一位少女（麦）敲开了若松制作公司的门，两人开始一起製作电影，青春、电影，还有爱情，一出青春群像剧就此展开。

Nicholas Ray ended his Hollywood career with his most expensive production, 55 Days in Peking (1963), and followed it ten years later with his least expensive, an experimental and politically radical independent feature made with his film students. Each movie is a shambles, though if I had to choose between them I'd probably opt for this one, which is certainly the more original. Ray and his students play themselves in docudrama situations that culminate in Ray's (fictional) suicide, and often he combines several images into crowded frescoes. The film reeks of countercultural alienation and anguish, and when it premiered at Cannes in 1973, Ray spoke of trying to make "what in our minds is a Guernica" out of such materials as "a broken-down Bolex" and "a Mitchell that costs $25 out of navy surplus." He tinkered with the film for years, and the 1976 date commonly assigned to it refers to a second unfinished version, which, lamentably, is unavailable. It's upsetting in many ways, but as a document of its time there's nothing remotely like it. 　　From 1971 to 1973, Ray taught filmmaking where he and his students produced We Can't Go Home Again, an autobiographical film employing multiple superimpositions. In the spring of 1972, Ray was asked to show some footage from the film at a conference. The audience was shocked to see footage of Ray and his students smoking marijuana together. An early version of the film was shown at the Cannes Film Festival in 1973, but Ray, never satisfied with the project, continued editing it until his death in 1979. He secured teaching positions at the Lee Strasberg Institute and New York University with the help of old friends.

Nicholas Ray ended his Hollywood career with his most expensive production, 55 Days in Peking (1963), and followed it ten years later with his least expensive, an experimental and politically radical independent feature made with his film students. Each movie is a shambles, though if I had to choose between them I'd probably opt for this one, which is certainly the more original. Ray and his students play themselves in docudrama situations that culminate in Ray's (fictional) suicide, and often he combines several images into crowded frescoes. The film reeks of countercultural alienation and anguish, and when it premiered at Cannes in 1973, Ray spoke of trying to make "what in our minds is a Guernica" out of such materials as "a broken-down Bolex" and "a Mitchell that costs $25 out of navy surplus." He tinkered with the film for years, and the 1976 date commonly assigned to it refers to a second unfinished version, which, lamentably, is unavailable. It's upsetting in many ways, but as a document of its time there's nothing remotely like it. 　　From 1971 to 1973, Ray taught filmmaking where he and his students produced We Can't Go Home Again, an autobiographical film employing multiple superimpositions. In the spring of 1972, Ray was asked to show some footage from the film at a conference. The audience was shocked to see footage of Ray and his students smoking marijuana together. An early version of the film was shown at the Cannes Film Festival in 1973, but Ray, never satisfied with the project, continued editing it until his death in 1979. He secured teaching positions at the Lee Strasberg Institute and New York University with the help of old friends.