"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

年逾古稀的阿兹海默老人某天误坐上一辆非正常接单“网约车”，在走马灯里陆续拼车四位邻座乘客，熟悉隐秘揭开于陌生下。

历史上第一部互动电影（interactive movie），观众可以通过按手中的红绿按钮来投票选择后面的剧情。1967年蒙特利尔世博会上捷克馆的一大看点。影片同时也是贯穿着捷克电影新浪潮的主题。

Documenting Horn & Hardart's iconic Automat, one of America's original and most popular restaurant chins in NYC & Philadelphia.

韩卿身为情感劝退师，受顾客委托调查其丈夫出轨，成为华京集团董事长冯斯乾的私人助理，被迫卷入一场精心策划的阴谋。两人为寻找真相，从猜忌、试探到携手、互助、坦诚，最终找到婚姻本质，也找到了真我的爱情故事。

该剧讲述了空间设计师步苒因一次偶然结识了同样有设计能力的老板路岑阳，两人经历挫折。始终一步一个脚印地走在愈发坚定的追梦之路上。虽历经坎坷，仍旧保持着热爱，忠于本心，最终收获到了行业里最真诚的回报。

该剧讲述了空间设计师步苒因一次偶然结识了同样有设计能力的老板路岑阳，两人经历挫折。始终一步一个脚印地走在愈发坚定的追梦之路上。虽历经坎坷，仍旧保持着热爱，忠于本心，最终收获到了行业里最真诚的回报。

姚青青重生回府，家人能听见她的心声。父亲姚父与妹妹姚青鸾密谋利用此事，国师诸葛玄察觉异常。青青借心声离间家人，并在洗尘宴上一舞惊人，向太子揭发姚青鸾与二皇子私通，致姚父被太子厌弃。她透露囤货商机，姚父获利后因姚青鸾贪婪未抛售，最终亏损。姚青鸾策划虫灾欲绑二皇子，被青青化解，皇帝遂赐婚她与诸葛玄。姚青鸾嫉恨下药替嫁，反被识破逐出家门。青青发现诸葛玄能听其真实心声，他为救她暴露能力。姚青鸾觉醒前世记忆，知青青心声为假，鼓动二皇子篡位失败遭报应。诸葛玄天劫需青青替劫，他放弃赴死，她赶去相救。二人共抗天雷，她心声不再外泄，他渡劫成功，终成眷属。

我拉着行李箱回到家，准备给男朋友一个惊喜，推开门却发现...