Four men killed Django's brother a long time ago. A withdrawn rancher, a notorious card player, a despotic priest and a crazy albino with an obsession for gold. The relentless Django seeks for revenge and hunts them down without mercy.

四川人民艺术剧院录制电视剧。本剧塑造了以某法院院长为代表的法律工作者不计个人得失，敢于否定自己，挽救了自认杀人并已被判处死刑的青年，查出了真正的凶手，维护了法律的尊严。

四川人民艺术剧院录制电视剧。本剧塑造了以某法院院长为代表的法律工作者不计个人得失，敢于否定自己，挽救了自认杀人并已被判处死刑的青年，查出了真正的凶手，维护了法律的尊严。

终于受不了丈夫的暴力相向，妻子抱着受伤的六岁女儿，满脸鲜血、鼻青脸肿地跑入警局求援。她要的不多，只求一纸判决伸张正义，可是比起家暴的皮肉疼痛，冗长官僚的菲律宾诉讼体系，更如心灵凌迟，令人绝望难忍。司法非关真相、非关正义，只关乎哪一方更能在法官面前舌粲善辩、搬弄法条。然而无论加害方或受害方，都将在这场为求胜诉、投注大量时间与金钱的困兽缠斗中，付出沉重代价⋯⋯。 　　菲律宾新锐编导雷蒙里贝古特列兹，师承电影大师曼多萨，将获奖短片延伸成首部长片作品。家暴事实历历在目，正义却渐行渐远，十足张力让人看得义愤填膺又莫可奈何。手持摄影与表演完美搭配，观众有如贴着角色呼吸，在拥挤闷热难熬的现实泥泞里，共感奋力一搏的挣扎喘息。

终于受不了丈夫的暴力相向，妻子抱着受伤的六岁女儿，满脸鲜血、鼻青脸肿地跑入警局求援。她要的不多，只求一纸判决伸张正义，可是比起家暴的皮肉疼痛，冗长官僚的菲律宾诉讼体系，更如心灵凌迟，令人绝望难忍。司法非关真相、非关正义，只关乎哪一方更能在法官面前舌粲善辩、搬弄法条。然而无论加害方或受害方，都将在这场为求胜诉、投注大量时间与金钱的困兽缠斗中，付出沉重代价⋯⋯。 　　菲律宾新锐编导雷蒙里贝古特列兹，师承电影大师曼多萨，将获奖短片延伸成首部长片作品。家暴事实历历在目，正义却渐行渐远，十足张力让人看得义愤填膺又莫可奈何。手持摄影与表演完美搭配，观众有如贴着角色呼吸，在拥挤闷热难熬的现实泥泞里，共感奋力一搏的挣扎喘息。

what a beautiful picture, what a great puzzle of poetry. there are many things that can be said about 'Sadgati'. 　　first of all, men try to succeed but fail in doing so, while women accomplish everything they want to do. women are happy, but become sad because of men. does this mean women do things better than men? this thought is shown with the use of insects: every time a woman does something in the film, we see grand things, like a big pile of mud and an expensive house. every time a man tries something in the film, he is put in the picture with insects close to the work he tries to do. does this mean men are insects? the dust can be Representative for the awareness of the women, who know something bad is going to happen. the big house of the 'bad' woman is full of richness and luxury. does this mean money kills emotion? could be, because the owners of the big house sleep in separate beds. so there's no mention of love in money? money is bad? but if money is bad, why do the poor men die? is poverty a richness? could be, because the real problems are left for the rich men, who will now have to explain why everything went wrong. however, the last image of the film shows us the real 'bad guy': the work itself. there will always be poor people and rich people because of the differences of work. that's not fair. because of that, accidents do happen as in the end of the film. if they should accept each other for who they are and without profits from work, everything would be fine. 　　with the difference of work, changes in character are important to the story too. the ant works hard and the grasshopper does nothing. it would be great if the ant and the grasshopper would be the same. 　　because that's the meaning of the picture: acceptance of who we are, knowledge of each others differences and the love of understanding.

Mr. Grodman was a respected superintendent at Scotland Yard until a mistake in an investigation caused the execution of an innocent man. He takes the blame and is dismissed, replaced by the obnoxious, gloating Buckley. Feeling vengeful, Grodman would like nothing more than to see Buckley look foolish on the job. His friend Victor Emmric, an artist with macabre tastes, wouldn't mind either and soon a mysterious murder occurs that may provide them with the chance.

what a beautiful picture, what a great puzzle of poetry. there are many things that can be said about 'Sadgati'. 　　first of all, men try to succeed but fail in doing so, while women accomplish everything they want to do. women are happy, but become sad because of men. does this mean women do things better than men? this thought is shown with the use of insects: every time a woman does something in the film, we see grand things, like a big pile of mud and an expensive house. every time a man tries something in the film, he is put in the picture with insects close to the work he tries to do. does this mean men are insects? the dust can be Representative for the awareness of the women, who know something bad is going to happen. the big house of the 'bad' woman is full of richness and luxury. does this mean money kills emotion? could be, because the owners of the big house sleep in separate beds. so there's no mention of love in money? money is bad? but if money is bad, why do the poor men die? is poverty a richness? could be, because the real problems are left for the rich men, who will now have to explain why everything went wrong. however, the last image of the film shows us the real 'bad guy': the work itself. there will always be poor people and rich people because of the differences of work. that's not fair. because of that, accidents do happen as in the end of the film. if they should accept each other for who they are and without profits from work, everything would be fine. 　　with the difference of work, changes in character are important to the story too. the ant works hard and the grasshopper does nothing. it would be great if the ant and the grasshopper would be the same. 　　because that's the meaning of the picture: acceptance of who we are, knowledge of each others differences and the love of understanding.