"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

法国第一女主播法兰西强悍娇艳，记者会上向总统犀利提问，转眼又眉来眼去频送秋波；坐镇主持政论节目，以完美妆容力战来宾；亲身前往远方战地“演绎”实…

法国第一女主播法兰西强悍娇艳，记者会上向总统犀利提问，转眼又眉来眼去频送秋波；坐镇主持政论节目，以完美妆容力战来宾；亲身前往远方战地“演绎”实况，还不忘忙碌奔波照顾家庭。她原是法国人心头上的一颗硃砂痣，一场肇事车祸却让她成了那抹蚊子血。法兰西发现主播的华美衣袍下其实爬满了蚤子，播报台下的美丽与哀愁谁人能解？当她决定洗尽铅华隐姓埋名，意外的邂逅突然降临，触动心中最柔软的那一块⋯⋯。 　　怪咖名导布鲁诺杜蒙以“法兰西”为名，直讽国家金玉其外却败絮其中的种种现象。从新闻操弄、难民问题到失能家庭，刻意营造的通俗手法与脸部特写，捕捉主角在虚假之外，无处安放的敏感脆弱。

获得最佳处女座的法国尚维果奖的是瑟齐波宗拉弗朗斯的一部“与众不同的一战影片－纽约时报”。一个令人沉醉的战时爱情和风格明亮的音乐，这部电影描述了一个原始世界（一个布列松遇到披头士的世界－《综艺》）。法国农场女孩凯米莉（西尔薇泰斯图德饰）等待着她上前线的丈夫（吉约姆德帕迪约饰）的消息。她接到他的一封莫名其妙的绝交信，于是女扮男装加入一支野战部队寻找她的爱人⋯⋯

Anniversaires 　　Série de courts métrages sur le thème de l'anniversaire dont Éric Rohmer a initié la production et dont il a confié la réalisation à quelques-unes de ses comédiennes et techniciennes complices. 　　France 　　Diane Baratier 　　France / 1996 / 17 min / Numérique 　　Avec Nathalie Moncorger, France Zobda, François Raoul-Duval. 　　RÉTROSPECTIVE ÉRIC ROHMER 　　JEUDI 31 JANVIER 2019, 14H30 　　SALLE GEORGES FRANJU

本杰明的父亲因为工作的原因远在巴西，将本杰明交给奶奶（若西安·巴拉斯科 Josiane Balasko 饰）和姥姥（芬妮·阿尔丹 Fanny Ardant 饰）共同抚养。本杰明告诉姥姥和奶奶，父亲让他们前往巴西去探亲，于是两老一小三人踏上了旅途，途中，一行人争吵不断，两个老太太互相看不顺眼没完没了的相互指责，麻烦不断。 　　好不容易到了巴西，却没见到父亲的身影。直到这时，本杰明才向老人们道出了真相，原来，父亲并不同意他的这趟探亲之旅，原因只有一个，那就是父亲在误打误撞之中被卷入了金矿贩毒案例。此时，犯罪团伙和警方双方都在对他进行搜捕。

故事发生在1940年的法国，米歇尔（琼·克劳馥 Joan Crawford 饰）是衔着金汤匙出生的千金大小姐，和实业家罗伯特（菲利普·多恩 Philip Dorn 饰）两人正在海滨度假。虽然外面的世界早已经战火纷飞，但是单纯的米歇尔坚信她平静富裕的生活不会被突如其来的战争破坏。 　　哪知道当她回到位于巴黎的别墅时才发现，自己的家被一群德国纳粹给占领了，虽然纳粹同意米歇尔继续住在家中，但与此同时米歇尔要忍受来自纳粹的侮辱和压迫，更让米歇尔感到愤怒的是，罗伯特竟然为了自己的利益暗地里和纳粹合作。一天，一位名叫帕特（约翰·韦恩 John Wayne 饰）的美国飞行员从天而降向米歇尔寻求庇护，他的到来彻底改变了米歇尔的生活。

第二次世界大战期间，O.S.S. 向纳粹占领的法国派遣了一队间谍和破坏者。

In the 1930s, we follow the story of the laundress Berthe who marries the eldest son of a bourgeois family.