Apichatpong Weerasethakul new shortfilm distributed in Youtube.

Apichatpong Weerasethakul new shortfilm distributed in Youtube.

影片改编自桥爪骏辉的同名小说，描写年轻人现实、表现“生存”与“爱”。北村饰演的是被上司否定了一切、通过SNS吐露心声的上班族“僕”，中川大志饰演及时行乐的Yusuke。松冈茉优饰演相信与Yusuke（中川大志 饰）的结婚会填满内心空缺的菜穗，古川琴音饰演与“僕”（北村匠海 饰）的留言产生共鸣，想成为特别的自己的“私”。

“我”和悠介是大学时代的死党。 一天，他们另一个死党“森”自杀的消息，改变了他们对人生爱的想法。 “我”是一名上班族，受尽上司儿玉的职权骚扰，只能在网路上发泄，却被昵称为“偶”的同事发现。 然而，“偶”竟然当众对着儿玉大喊「你何不去死一死？」“我”听见自己的心声被大喊出来，因此对“偶”产生微妙的感情。 悠介从小就是人生胜利组，享受人生、活在当下。 他众多女友之一的菜穗却相信只要和悠介结婚，自己的人生一定会有所改变。 本片描绘了深陷于理想和现实的差异，仍然努力面对这个社会、面对自己的四个年轻男女。

终于受不了丈夫的暴力相向，妻子抱着受伤的六岁女儿，满脸鲜血、鼻青脸肿地跑入警局求援。她要的不多，只求一纸判决伸张正义，可是比起家暴的皮肉疼痛，冗长官僚的菲律宾诉讼体系，更如心灵凌迟，令人绝望难忍。司法非关真相、非关正义，只关乎哪一方更能在法官面前舌粲善辩、搬弄法条。然而无论加害方或受害方，都将在这场为求胜诉、投注大量时间与金钱的困兽缠斗中，付出沉重代价⋯⋯。 　　菲律宾新锐编导雷蒙里贝古特列兹，师承电影大师曼多萨，将获奖短片延伸成首部长片作品。家暴事实历历在目，正义却渐行渐远，十足张力让人看得义愤填膺又莫可奈何。手持摄影与表演完美搭配，观众有如贴着角色呼吸，在拥挤闷热难熬的现实泥泞里，共感奋力一搏的挣扎喘息。

终于受不了丈夫的暴力相向，妻子抱着受伤的六岁女儿，满脸鲜血、鼻青脸肿地跑入警局求援。她要的不多，只求一纸判决伸张正义，可是比起家暴的皮肉疼痛，冗长官僚的菲律宾诉讼体系，更如心灵凌迟，令人绝望难忍。司法非关真相、非关正义，只关乎哪一方更能在法官面前舌粲善辩、搬弄法条。然而无论加害方或受害方，都将在这场为求胜诉、投注大量时间与金钱的困兽缠斗中，付出沉重代价⋯⋯。 　　菲律宾新锐编导雷蒙里贝古特列兹，师承电影大师曼多萨，将获奖短片延伸成首部长片作品。家暴事实历历在目，正义却渐行渐远，十足张力让人看得义愤填膺又莫可奈何。手持摄影与表演完美搭配，观众有如贴着角色呼吸，在拥挤闷热难熬的现实泥泞里，共感奋力一搏的挣扎喘息。

what a beautiful picture, what a great puzzle of poetry. there are many things that can be said about 'Sadgati'. 　　first of all, men try to succeed but fail in doing so, while women accomplish everything they want to do. women are happy, but become sad because of men. does this mean women do things better than men? this thought is shown with the use of insects: every time a woman does something in the film, we see grand things, like a big pile of mud and an expensive house. every time a man tries something in the film, he is put in the picture with insects close to the work he tries to do. does this mean men are insects? the dust can be Representative for the awareness of the women, who know something bad is going to happen. the big house of the 'bad' woman is full of richness and luxury. does this mean money kills emotion? could be, because the owners of the big house sleep in separate beds. so there's no mention of love in money? money is bad? but if money is bad, why do the poor men die? is poverty a richness? could be, because the real problems are left for the rich men, who will now have to explain why everything went wrong. however, the last image of the film shows us the real 'bad guy': the work itself. there will always be poor people and rich people because of the differences of work. that's not fair. because of that, accidents do happen as in the end of the film. if they should accept each other for who they are and without profits from work, everything would be fine. 　　with the difference of work, changes in character are important to the story too. the ant works hard and the grasshopper does nothing. it would be great if the ant and the grasshopper would be the same. 　　because that's the meaning of the picture: acceptance of who we are, knowledge of each others differences and the love of understanding.

饱受虐待的妻子终于起诉他的丈夫。