为求自保，独居女子为安全假装家有男性，外卖员送餐时配合演戏。却在未开门前被门外骑手一语道破“别演了，你一个人，对吧？”。瞬间的机智应对化作毛骨悚然的寒意。一则关于独居安全与细思极恐瞬间的都市故事...

电影《瞧一桥》改编自豆瓣长篇小说《狗夫200天》，讲述了65岁退休桥梁工程师张倩影（惠英红 饰）与问题少年陈志勇（胡先煦 饰）因一段跨省代驾而结识，一路上发生的一连串温暖治愈又直戳心窝的故事，让两个孤独的人逐渐走近，最终相互理解与救赎。

电影《瞧一桥》改编自豆瓣长篇小说《狗夫200天》，讲述了65岁退休桥梁工程师张倩影（惠英红 饰）与问题少年陈志勇（胡先煦 饰）因一段跨省代驾而结识，一路上发生的一连串温暖治愈又直戳心窝的故事，让两个孤独的人逐渐走近，最终相互理解与救赎。

张强是一名普通的快递员。一个偶然的机会，他误入了一个悬疑小说家的世界，被卷入了一场名为“暗网悬疑小说大赛”的竞赛，被迫参加这场谁是凶手的真人秀。他必须运用自己的智慧和勇气，去解开谜题，找到最终的答案。

以“外卖员的生活”为主线，讲述一位外卖员原本宁静、平凡的生活，因为一场车祸变得支离破碎，又因一场灾难而重拾希望，其中夹杂着不可告人的秘密及关乎人性的抉择。

大半夜被馋虫勾得睡不着，想点外卖的我用新账户注册领优惠券，一番手忙脚乱的操作后，页面竟跳成 “已成为外卖员”。正准备退出重新注册，一条订单提示突然弹出：【可爱炸炸鸡一份，幸福小区 405，外卖费 1000】。盯着 “1000” 反复数了三遍，确认没看错后，刚要按退出的手指猛地停住 —— 干脆点了接单。虽说已是午夜，我对幸福小区也完全陌生，可一千块的外卖费实在太诱人，心里只剩一个念头：就算客户要的东西再离谱，这单我也得亲手送到门口。

近日由北大星光投资制作的都市爱情轻喜剧《给幸福下订单》在京举行开机发布会，导演张晓光携主演何晟铭、周显欣、李解等实力演员集体亮相。 　　《给幸福下订单》讲述的是由何晟铭饰演的城管周大方，生活邋遢但却充满智慧，一生做着＂英雄梦＂却无奈做了小城管，不料乐观积极的大方在工作中偶遇白富美妇产科医生柳悦（周显欣饰），俩人阴差阳错擦出了爱的火花，最终身份地位悬殊的二人冲破重重阻挠，有情人终成眷属。

近日由北大星光投资制作的都市爱情轻喜剧《给幸福下订单》在京举行开机发布会，导演张晓光携主演何晟铭、周显欣、李解等实力演员集体亮相。 　　《给幸福下订单》讲述的是由何晟铭饰演的城管周大方，生活邋遢但却充满智慧，一生做着＂英雄梦＂却无奈做了小城管，不料乐观积极的大方在工作中偶遇白富美妇产科医生柳悦（周显欣饰），俩人阴差阳错擦出了爱的火花，最终身份地位悬殊的二人冲破重重阻挠，有情人终成眷属。

Kiarostami presents two cases for talking heads to evaluate in terms of morality, rights and responsibilities. Case One: Your son is in class, sitting in the back row. His teacher is writing on the board. A restless student in the back row makes a lot of noise. Not knowing who the culprit is, the teacher makes all the children sitting in the last two rows stay outside of the class until the weekend, unless they tell him who made the noise. After a few days spent outside of the classroom, your son relents and tattles on the boy who made the noise, so he can go back in and continue learning. Was he in the right? Case Two: The other students from the back row wait out the rest of the week outside of the class, before returning. Were they in the right?

Kiarostami presents two cases for talking heads to evaluate in terms of morality, rights and responsibilities. Case One: Your son is in class, sitting in the back row. His teacher is writing on the board. A restless student in the back row makes a lot of noise. Not knowing who the culprit is, the teacher makes all the children sitting in the last two rows stay outside of the class until the weekend, unless they tell him who made the noise. After a few days spent outside of the classroom, your son relents and tattles on the boy who made the noise, so he can go back in and continue learning. Was he in the right? Case Two: The other students from the back row wait out the rest of the week outside of the class, before returning. Were they in the right?