在安哲罗普洛斯位于希腊的家中，日本作家兼诗人池泽夏树对他的访谈。 　　全片文本见：http://www.douban.com/group/topic/1045814/

在安哲罗普洛斯位于希腊的家中，日本作家兼诗人池泽夏树对他的访谈。 　　全片文本见：http://www.douban.com/group/topic/1045814/

A look at the extraordinary achievements and contemporary legacy of Oscar Micheaux, a pioneer of the African-American film industry.

Paul Merton制作的早期默片回顾史，主要还是集中在喜剧方面，可以算是Silent Clowns（http://movie.douban.com/subject/3648586/）的前传

Paul Merton制作的早期默片回顾史，主要还是集中在喜剧方面，可以算是Silent Clowns（http://movie.douban.com/subject/3648586/）的前传

杜琪峰，一位從97後香港影業低潮中崛起的本地導演。從逆境中突圍，杜琪峰的電影作品從通俗化到作者化，更慢慢與“香港”這座城市密不可分。經歷香港回歸後的15年，面對合拍的關口，一切仍是未知數，環境一直在變化，唯有他對電影的愛沒有變。 　　面對浩淼的電影世界，滄海一粟，他唯一做的是不能停步。

杜琪峰，一位从97后香港影业低潮中崛起的本地导演。从逆境中突围，杜琪峰的电影作品从通俗化到作者化，更慢慢与“香港”这座城市密不可分。经历香港回归后的15年，面对合拍的关口，一切仍是未知数，环境一直在变化，唯有他对电影的爱没有变。 　　面对浩淼的电影世界，沧海一粟，他唯一做的是不能停步。

The third of the short films on the Best v Best Vol 2 DVD that I watched made me think that perhaps I am doomed to be on the outside looking in with all the films. I say this because Wayfarers just cracked on into what it wanted to do without really giving me anything to help me come along with it. With other films this was a minor issue but here it was a big one. A ten minute look around the grounds and patients within some sort of home for the mentally challenged is fine and it was reasonably interesting but the approach meant it was never more than that. 　　I saw the people and the place but never felt anything for them or understood the wider aim of the film. Is this home part of a bigger failure in Ukraine to deal with the needy of society? I have no idea and, despite having watched this film, still have no idea. Visually the film is great. I really liked the black and white and enjoyed the mix of mobile shots, candid shots and portrait-like, silent frames of the people. It helps it a lot although the failure in the material cannot be redeemed solely by this strength. 　　Overall then, stylistically an interesting film but one where it cries out for context and some sort of help for the audience. For viewers who are aware of the bigger picture or of the relevance, this may prove touching but for myself it was well put together and sadly nothing more than that.

The third of the short films on the Best v Best Vol 2 DVD that I watched made me think that perhaps I am doomed to be on the outside looking in with all the films. I say this because Wayfarers just cracked on into what it wanted to do without really giving me anything to help me come along with it. With other films this was a minor issue but here it was a big one. A ten minute look around the grounds and patients within some sort of home for the mentally challenged is fine and it was reasonably interesting but the approach meant it was never more than that. 　　I saw the people and the place but never felt anything for them or understood the wider aim of the film. Is this home part of a bigger failure in Ukraine to deal with the needy of society? I have no idea and, despite having watched this film, still have no idea. Visually the film is great. I really liked the black and white and enjoyed the mix of mobile shots, candid shots and portrait-like, silent frames of the people. It helps it a lot although the failure in the material cannot be redeemed solely by this strength. 　　Overall then, stylistically an interesting film but one where it cries out for context and some sort of help for the audience. For viewers who are aware of the bigger picture or of the relevance, this may prove touching but for myself it was well put together and sadly nothing more than that.