"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

Documenting Horn & Hardart's iconic Automat, one of America's original and most popular restaurant chins in NYC & Philadelphia.

历史上第一部互动电影（interactive movie），观众可以通过按手中的红绿按钮来投票选择后面的剧情。1967年蒙特利尔世博会上捷克馆的一大看点。影片同时也是贯穿着捷克电影新浪潮的主题。

某富豪财大气粗，高薪聘请专家将他的别墅改造成全自动化现代房屋。拥有植物学博士专业头衔的青年（巴斯特·基顿 Buster Keaton 饰）参加应聘，却在阴差阳错之中和邻座的两人将学位证书搞混，变成了电气学专业的博士。青年有心反悔，但看在富翁女儿貌美如花、亲近可人的份上，也就应承了下来。 　　不久后，富翁一家驱车度假，留下青年一人改造房屋。他临时抱佛脚，凭借一本电气学基础知识的课本大刀阔斧干了起来。时间转瞬即逝，数日后富翁返回，等待他们的是一座令人难以想象且叹为观止的全自动化现代房屋……

某富豪财大气粗，高薪聘请专家将他的别墅改造成全自动化现代房屋。拥有植物学博士专业头衔的青年（巴斯特·基顿 Buster Keaton 饰）参加应聘，却在阴差阳错之中和邻座的两人将学位证书搞混，变成了电气学专业的博士。青年有心反悔，但看在富翁女儿貌美如花、亲近可人的份上，也就应承了下来。 　　不久后，富翁一家驱车度假，留下青年一人改造房屋。他临时抱佛脚，凭借一本电气学基础知识的课本大刀阔斧干了起来。时间转瞬即逝，数日后富翁返回，等待他们的是一座令人难以想象且叹为观止的全自动化现代房屋……

“Continued explorations of automatism as a practical guide to negotiating the mysterious zone where light and no-light flutter in a fecund equipoise. A homemade rocket to realms unknown to any movie camera or photo lens. In the end, perhaps nothing more than a search for an experience of continuity, a kind of sanity. Failing sanity, a wild ride at least.”

英格丽德是一位单身母亲，她与女儿和祖母住在斯洛伐克东部的一个村庄，在那里罗姆人面临歧视，为了生存，她成为了一名罗姆女孩的职业母亲。

A series of short training videos done by Mike Ehrmantraut for Madrigal Electromotive employees.

A series of short training videos done by Mike Ehrmantraut for Madrigal Electromotive employees.