屡获殊荣的媒体艺术家雷菲克·安纳多尔（Refik Anadol）与意大利珠宝世家BVLGARI宝格丽携手开启一场沉浸式艺术之旅，探索品牌最具标志性的"灵蛇"符号的无限维度。这是一场历时一年的创意实验﹣﹣艺术灵感与数字创新在此交融，匠心工艺与科技未来于此共鸣。本片首次独家记录这一创想过程，揭秘传统与革新如何碰撞共生，最终缔造出时代杰作。

屡获殊荣的媒体艺术家雷菲克·安纳多尔（Refik Anadol）与意大利珠宝世家BVLGARI宝格丽携手开启一场沉浸式艺术之旅，探索品牌最具标志性的"灵蛇"符号的无限维度。这是一场历时一年的创意实验﹣﹣艺术灵感与数字创新在此交融，匠心工艺与科技未来于此共鸣。本片首次独家记录这一创想过程，揭秘传统与革新如何碰撞共生，最终缔造出时代杰作。

本片记录了国产B级片演员胡子对“自己到底想要做什么？”的一段探索历程。一个没有意思的人如何才能找到他认为有意思的事来做？如果一个人终于找到了他认为有意思的事，这和他自身的存在意义又有什么关系？还是在某个时机之下两者其实是一回事？如果一个人认为他的存在是没有意义的，那么至少在他头脑中还有意义这个概念。如果他认为意义本身毫无意义，他只是自己想着“什么都不是”然后再根据这个意思否定这个意思有“什么都不是”之外的其他任何意思。把意义的概念定义为“空”不能证明意义不可以“有”。也许他只是还没有找到，也许找到了但不能确定。当然，有可能他永远也无法找到，或者即便找到了也永远无法确定...

本片记录了国产B级片演员胡子对“自己到底想要做什么？”的一段探索历程。一个没有意思的人如何才能找到他认为有意思的事来做？如果一个人终于找到了他认为有意思的事，这和他自身的存在意义又有什么关系？还是在某个时机之下两者其实是一回事？如果一个人认为他的存在是没有意义的，那么至少在他头脑中还有意义这个概念。如果他认为意义本身毫无意义，他只是自己想着“什么都不是”然后再根据这个意思否定这个意思有“什么都不是”之外的其他任何意思。把意义的概念定义为“空”不能证明意义不可以“有”。也许他只是还没有找到，也许找到了但不能确定。当然，有可能他永远也无法找到，或者即便找到了也永远无法确定...

Semiotics of the Kitchen adopts the form of a parodic cooking demonstration in which, Rosler states, "An anti-Julia Child replaces the domesticated 'meaning' of tools with a lexicon of rage and frustration." In this performance-based work, a static camera is focused on a woman in a kitchen. On a counter before her are a variety of utensils, each of which she picks up, names and proceeds to demonstrate, but with gestures that depart from the normal uses of the tool. In an ironic grammatology of sound and gesture, the woman and her implements enter and transgress the familiar system of everyday kitchen meanings — the securely understood signs of domestic industry and food production erupt into anger and violence. In this alphabet of kitchen implements, states Rosler, "when the woman speaks, she names her own oppression."

Semiotics of the Kitchen adopts the form of a parodic cooking demonstration in which, Rosler states, "An anti-Julia Child replaces the domesticated 'meaning' of tools with a lexicon of rage and frustration." In this performance-based work, a static camera is focused on a woman in a kitchen. On a counter before her are a variety of utensils, each of which she picks up, names and proceeds to demonstrate, but with gestures that depart from the normal uses of the tool. In an ironic grammatology of sound and gesture, the woman and her implements enter and transgress the familiar system of everyday kitchen meanings — the securely understood signs of domestic industry and food production erupt into anger and violence. In this alphabet of kitchen implements, states Rosler, "when the woman speaks, she names her own oppression."

2021威尼斯电影节非竞赛展映。

2021威尼斯电影节非竞赛展映。

沈念前世因无条件溺爱侄子，饱尝家人冷漠与伤害，最终悲惨离世。重获新生，她誓要改变命运。这一世，她决定收起无原则的溺爱，对侄子的行为放任自流，不再让自己重蹈覆辙。她要活出自我，守护自己的幸福，不再让任何人轻易伤害到自己。

Julian inherits a house in West Philadelphia from his grandmother and asks his girlfriend Gwen to move in, although she turns out to be just the first member of the commune that sets up home with him within its brightly coloured walls. Together with the founding couple, the seven-strong collective are soon reciting African-American poetry, reading post-colonial theory, holding seminars on Sudanese languages and enjoying jazz-inflected jam sessions, with the chest of materials on the wider Black experience apparently left behind by the grandmother proving perfect inspiration to this end. With the prominent poster of Godard’s La chinoise hanging in the kitchen, it’s tempting to read their funkily cerebral exploits as pure fiction, yet they’re actually a reenactment of Asili’s own experiences in a Marxist commune. Real life informs the fiction elsewhere too, as members of the MOVE Organization come to speak at the house, the camera alights on significant sites for the Black community outside in the Philadelphia streets and the inevitable petty arguments about house rules rear their head. And maybe that’s the point: theory rubs up against practice and sparks duly fly.