Interrogation can be tough. It takes patience and a lively wit to get the desired results. And even then it may not work out for Detective Anderson and Bradley Bandor.

THE STORE is a film about the main Neiman-Marcus store and corporate 　　headquarters in Dallas. The sequences in the film include the selection, presentation, 　　marketing, pricing, advertising and selling of a vast array of consumer products including 　　designer clothes and furs, jewelry, perfumes, shoes, electronic products, sportswear, china 　　and porcelain and many other goods. The internal management and organizational aspects 　　of a large corporation are shown, i.e., sales meetings, development of marketing and 　　advertising strategies, training, personnel practices and sales techniques.

THE STORE is a film about the main Neiman-Marcus store and corporate 　　headquarters in Dallas. The sequences in the film include the selection, presentation, 　　marketing, pricing, advertising and selling of a vast array of consumer products including 　　designer clothes and furs, jewelry, perfumes, shoes, electronic products, sportswear, china 　　and porcelain and many other goods. The internal management and organizational aspects 　　of a large corporation are shown, i.e., sales meetings, development of marketing and 　　advertising strategies, training, personnel practices and sales techniques.

《物质》定位十分明确：如何记录一个正处在转型期的国家？如何组织这些松散的材料？1989年前的生活给我们留下了什么？未来有什么希望？应该怎样处理这些“剩下的”图片？ 　　没有平白的叙述，只有导演的只言片语和Charles Ives哀伤的挽歌。导演通过对过去二十年来自己以及其他人拍摄的素材的整理和剪辑，让这些影像自己说话。从最近柏林的骚乱到1989年底亚历山大的大型集会，这是一个群众无视当局的罕见时刻，让人感觉任何事都可能发生。从舞台导演Fritz Marquardt在使《海纳穆勒的日耳曼-死在柏林》登上舞台的联合项目中的初步谈判到今天共和国宫的毁坏。在这部影片中，Heise用他自己的方式回顾了德国历史。从二十世纪八十年起Thomas Heise就开始这项工作，将社会政治问题融合在探索历史的过程之中。以新旧辩证的眼光，Thomas Heise密切的观察，让事件自己说话，为历史创造了更多可能。 　　A slow pan shot sweeps over a piece of wasteland next to a ruin, with the laughter of children playing in the distance: providing the background of these three motifs – childhood, landscape and loss. Then an announcement follows: “Certain things remain as surplus, leftovers that are undeveloped, unfinished. It is the same with images waiting for a story”. These unedited images, the very substance of the film, were made in the margins of other films (his own or other people’s) or shot under the urgent pressure of events. They cover the last twenty years. 　　The space of his Material is precise and well-defined: how to document a country undergoing transformation, how to articulate this scattered material, what is left of Life before 1989 and of the hopes for the future? What should be done with these ‘left-over’ images? 　　Nothing is explained directly, apart from a few rare snatches of the director’s commentary and the elegiac, melancholic music of Charles Ives. Heise leaves these situations caught up in their own intensity: from a recent riot of hoodies in Berlin to the enormous rally in the Alexanderplatz at the end of 1989, showing the crowds defying the authorities in one of those rare moments when there is a feeling that anything could happen; from preliminary discussions with the stage director Fritz Marquardt on a joint project to stage Heiner Müller’s Germania – Death in Berlin, to what remains today of the gutted Palace of the Republic. 　　In Material , Heise has constructed a personal reflection on Germany’s history and on his own method. Thomas Heise has been ploughing this furrow ever since the 1980s in the GDR, weaving together socio-political issues in his exploration of History. In a dialectic of the Old and the New, closely observing faces and letting words deploy themselves, he pays the necessary attention to this gesture, which opens up the material of History itself and its possibilities. 　　Film material shot over a 20 year period, a visual diary, outtakes that just will not leave their creators alone. Put together in a poetic way, in which chronology takes a back seat to sense and atmosphere. History is not a linear sequence but a pile of events.

《物质》定位十分明确：如何记录一个正处在转型期的国家？如何组织这些松散的材料？1989年前的生活给我们留下了什么？未来有什么希望？应该怎样处理这些“剩下的”图片？ 　　没有平白的叙述，只有导演的只言片语和Charles Ives哀伤的挽歌。导演通过对过去二十年来自己以及其他人拍摄的素材的整理和剪辑，让这些影像自己说话。从最近柏林的骚乱到1989年底亚历山大的大型集会，这是一个群众无视当局的罕见时刻，让人感觉任何事都可能发生。从舞台导演Fritz Marquardt在使《海纳穆勒的日耳曼-死在柏林》登上舞台的联合项目中的初步谈判到今天共和国宫的毁坏。在这部影片中，Heise用他自己的方式回顾了德国历史。从二十世纪八十年起Thomas Heise就开始这项工作，将社会政治问题融合在探索历史的过程之中。以新旧辩证的眼光，Thomas Heise密切的观察，让事件自己说话，为历史创造了更多可能。 　　A slow pan shot sweeps over a piece of wasteland next to a ruin, with the laughter of children playing in the distance: providing the background of these three motifs – childhood, landscape and loss. Then an announcement follows: “Certain things remain as surplus, leftovers that are undeveloped, unfinished. It is the same with images waiting for a story”. These unedited images, the very substance of the film, were made in the margins of other films (his own or other people’s) or shot under the urgent pressure of events. They cover the last twenty years. 　　The space of his Material is precise and well-defined: how to document a country undergoing transformation, how to articulate this scattered material, what is left of Life before 1989 and of the hopes for the future? What should be done with these ‘left-over’ images? 　　Nothing is explained directly, apart from a few rare snatches of the director’s commentary and the elegiac, melancholic music of Charles Ives. Heise leaves these situations caught up in their own intensity: from a recent riot of hoodies in Berlin to the enormous rally in the Alexanderplatz at the end of 1989, showing the crowds defying the authorities in one of those rare moments when there is a feeling that anything could happen; from preliminary discussions with the stage director Fritz Marquardt on a joint project to stage Heiner Müller’s Germania – Death in Berlin, to what remains today of the gutted Palace of the Republic. 　　In Material , Heise has constructed a personal reflection on Germany’s history and on his own method. Thomas Heise has been ploughing this furrow ever since the 1980s in the GDR, weaving together socio-political issues in his exploration of History. In a dialectic of the Old and the New, closely observing faces and letting words deploy themselves, he pays the necessary attention to this gesture, which opens up the material of History itself and its possibilities. 　　Film material shot over a 20 year period, a visual diary, outtakes that just will not leave their creators alone. Put together in a poetic way, in which chronology takes a back seat to sense and atmosphere. History is not a linear sequence but a pile of events.

深巷的尽头，一间“照明商店”长年亮着灯，神秘的老板（刘奕君 饰）细心擦拭着每一个灯泡，形形色色的客人络绎不绝。护士许念（章若楠 饰）和男友郑满（白宇帆 饰）新搬进了商店附近的公寓。她渐渐发现，这里的每一个人，心底都有一个不可言说的秘密。暴风雨之夜，她走进了巷尾的照明商店，答案渐渐被揭开……

深巷的尽头，一间“照明商店”长年亮着灯，神秘的老板（刘奕君 饰）细心擦拭着每一个灯泡，形形色色的客人络绎不绝。护士许念（章若楠 饰）和男友郑满（白宇帆 饰）新搬进了商店附近的公寓。她渐渐发现，这里的每一个人，心底都有一个不可言说的秘密。暴风雨之夜，她走进了巷尾的照明商店，答案渐渐被揭开……

未来商店——一家专门为顾客排忧解难的神秘商店，各种脑洞大开的道具将在关键时刻神兵天降。八位新锐导演联手带来八个独立故事，每个看似奇葩又搞怪的需求背后，隐藏着怎样的故事？

该剧改编自姜草的同名漫画，讲述在售卖照明灯具的商店里，连接阳间和阴间的生者和亡者的故事。 　　一群素昧平生的人，努力与过去和解。试图抚平过往伤痛的陌生人们，在因缘际会下，被吸引到一间在幽暗巷子尽头的照明商店。 　　“照明商店”由一名警戒心极高的老板独自看守，这间店成为串联这群陌生人的过去、现在和未来的关键。

该剧改编自姜草的同名漫画，以一家开设在小巷深处的灯具店为背景，讲述了五位徘徊在生与死之间的“顾客”的故事，剧情看似惊悚诡异，实则洋溢着满满的亲情、爱情，看来令人不忍释卷。朱智勋饰演商店的主人公引领故事发展。金雪炫饰演和贤敏是恋人的智英，因为贤敏遭遇不义事故，智英被贤敏的母亲暴言然后选择自我了断的人物。黑暗笼罩的小巷尽头，有一家人际罕至的照明商店，这里每天都会出现一些奇怪的人。商店的老板对于他们的到来一点都不惊讶，只是不停地擦着灯泡。但是他却告诫一位经常来店里买灯泡的少女要“小心陌生人”……指甲长在指腹上的女子，耳朵流出沙子的男人，全身湿透的司机，走不出胡同的小男孩……在这些人身上到底发生了什么事情？亮着的灯泡和坏掉的灯泡，这里就是分辨生命与死亡的《照明商店》。