A son and his father are affected, in different ways, by the end of life, one from his grandfather, the other from his father. (from MUBI)

A son and his father are affected, in different ways, by the end of life, one from his grandfather, the other from his father. (from MUBI)

1969年，33岁的未来名监督 若松孝二（井浦新），热衷于粉红电影的制作，此时，一位少女（麦）敲开了若松制作公司的门，两人开始一起製作电影，青春、电影，还有爱情，一出青春群像剧就此展开。

Nicholas Ray ended his Hollywood career with his most expensive production, 55 Days in Peking (1963), and followed it ten years later with his least expensive, an experimental and politically radical independent feature made with his film students. Each movie is a shambles, though if I had to choose between them I'd probably opt for this one, which is certainly the more original. Ray and his students play themselves in docudrama situations that culminate in Ray's (fictional) suicide, and often he combines several images into crowded frescoes. The film reeks of countercultural alienation and anguish, and when it premiered at Cannes in 1973, Ray spoke of trying to make "what in our minds is a Guernica" out of such materials as "a broken-down Bolex" and "a Mitchell that costs $25 out of navy surplus." He tinkered with the film for years, and the 1976 date commonly assigned to it refers to a second unfinished version, which, lamentably, is unavailable. It's upsetting in many ways, but as a document of its time there's nothing remotely like it. 　　From 1971 to 1973, Ray taught filmmaking where he and his students produced We Can't Go Home Again, an autobiographical film employing multiple superimpositions. In the spring of 1972, Ray was asked to show some footage from the film at a conference. The audience was shocked to see footage of Ray and his students smoking marijuana together. An early version of the film was shown at the Cannes Film Festival in 1973, but Ray, never satisfied with the project, continued editing it until his death in 1979. He secured teaching positions at the Lee Strasberg Institute and New York University with the help of old friends.

Nicholas Ray ended his Hollywood career with his most expensive production, 55 Days in Peking (1963), and followed it ten years later with his least expensive, an experimental and politically radical independent feature made with his film students. Each movie is a shambles, though if I had to choose between them I'd probably opt for this one, which is certainly the more original. Ray and his students play themselves in docudrama situations that culminate in Ray's (fictional) suicide, and often he combines several images into crowded frescoes. The film reeks of countercultural alienation and anguish, and when it premiered at Cannes in 1973, Ray spoke of trying to make "what in our minds is a Guernica" out of such materials as "a broken-down Bolex" and "a Mitchell that costs $25 out of navy surplus." He tinkered with the film for years, and the 1976 date commonly assigned to it refers to a second unfinished version, which, lamentably, is unavailable. It's upsetting in many ways, but as a document of its time there's nothing remotely like it. 　　From 1971 to 1973, Ray taught filmmaking where he and his students produced We Can't Go Home Again, an autobiographical film employing multiple superimpositions. In the spring of 1972, Ray was asked to show some footage from the film at a conference. The audience was shocked to see footage of Ray and his students smoking marijuana together. An early version of the film was shown at the Cannes Film Festival in 1973, but Ray, never satisfied with the project, continued editing it until his death in 1979. He secured teaching positions at the Lee Strasberg Institute and New York University with the help of old friends.

Nicholas Ray ended his Hollywood career with his most expensive production, 55 Days in Peking (1963), and followed it ten years later with his least expensive, an experimental and politically radical independent feature made with his film students. Each movie is a shambles, though if I had to choose between them I'd probably opt for this one, which is certainly the more original. Ray and his students play themselves in docudrama situations that culminate in Ray's (fictional) suicide, and often he combines several images into crowded frescoes. The film reeks of countercultural alienation and anguish, and when it premiered at Cannes in 1973, Ray spoke of trying to make "what in our minds is a Guernica" out of such materials as "a broken-down Bolex" and "a Mitchell that costs $25 out of navy surplus." He tinkered with the film for years, and the 1976 date commonly assigned to it refers to a second unfinished version, which, lamentably, is unavailable. It's upsetting in many ways, but as a document of its time there's nothing remotely like it. 　　From 1971 to 1973, Ray taught filmmaking where he and his students produced We Can't Go Home Again, an autobiographical film employing multiple superimpositions. In the spring of 1972, Ray was asked to show some footage from the film at a conference. The audience was shocked to see footage of Ray and his students smoking marijuana together. An early version of the film was shown at the Cannes Film Festival in 1973, but Ray, never satisfied with the project, continued editing it until his death in 1979. He secured teaching positions at the Lee Strasberg Institute and New York University with the help of old friends.

阿曼达（玛丽·玛特琳 Marlee Matlin饰），一位离婚的普通摄影师。她每日的生活平淡又死气沉沉，直到一日她经历了一段犹如“爱丽丝梦游仙境”般奇妙梦幻的时光。影片惊人的视觉特效让观众置身于阿曼达的神经世界里，一览微妙的细胞、分子甚至是量子世界。影片采访了多位著名学者，讨论关于真相、记忆、眼睛、大脑等深奥的话题。 　　本部标新立异、别出心裁的影片《我们到底知道多少？》，融合了纪实、剧情、视觉特效、动画等多种表现手法于一身，充满着量子论、物质、真理等一系列深奥玄妙的概念，构建出一个充满不确定性的量子世界。在这个看似稀松平常的未知领域里，到底何为真实。

阿曼达（玛丽·玛特琳 Marlee Matlin饰），一位离婚的普通摄影师。她每日的生活平淡又死气沉沉，直到一日她经历了一段犹如“爱丽丝梦游仙境”般奇妙梦幻的时光。影片惊人的视觉特效让观众置身于阿曼达的神经世界里，一览微妙的细胞、分子甚至是量子世界。影片采访了多位著名学者，讨论关于真相、记忆、眼睛、大脑等深奥的话题。 　　本部标新立异、别出心裁的影片《我们到底知道多少？》，融合了纪实、剧情、视觉特效、动画等多种表现手法于一身，充满着量子论、物质、真理等一系列深奥玄妙的概念，构建出一个充满不确定性的量子世界。在这个看似稀松平常的未知领域里，到底何为真实。

深夜，因为各自的理由而无法入睡的四个男女，帮我们演绎了关于年轻的灵魂，悸动的心情，青涩而真挚的爱恋。

深夜，因为各自的理由而无法入睡的四个男女，帮我们演绎了关于年轻的灵魂，悸动的心情，青涩而真挚的爱恋。