宋襄是严总的私人秘书负责严总的一切却发现严总只是把她作为工具弃之如履于是她决定离开严总没想到前总裁竟开始穷追不舍。

女主是男主的地下情人，男主明面上还有一个大家公认的正牌女友，女主想要公开和男主的恋情，男主不愿意，随后女主和 男主产生一系列感情上的拉扯

兩位年輕的女導演以影像書信的對話形式討論電影、家庭、母職等。運用深刻的個人反思將日常生活體現於電影中。這些影像片段不僅促使兩人審視自己，也彼此分享自己的一部分。透過鏡頭，同時記錄了時代的變化。

兩位年輕的女導演以影像書信的對話形式討論電影、家庭、母職等。運用深刻的個人反思將日常生活體現於電影中。這些影像片段不僅促使兩人審視自己，也彼此分享自己的一部分。透過鏡頭，同時記錄了時代的變化。

This correspondence, or exchange of letters and video diaries between acclaimed filmmakers Jonas Mekas and José Luis Guerin is extremely potent, there's sorcery at play in the mixture of the two. Together they're light and dark. Mekas knows life's joys, and is always a participant in what he films, Guerín is a detached observer, cold, present only as a black mote, reflected in the eye of one of his subjects. Guerín shoots in black and white and strives for formalism, Mekas loves hazard, loves his chaotic hand-held colour camera. Jonas Mekas felt that his images were inferior to those of Guerín, but a picture of his son Sebastian devouring a pickle, followed by Jonas on the deli sausage and wine, and then a cheeky close up of Goethe's Faust; which of them Faust and which Mephistopheles? That one shot set me thinking about the nature of art and the privilege of artists, and could be interpreted in any one of several fruitful ways. 　　Guerín's Camera is brutal, his viewpoint black, on death and distance. He sends Jonas a morbid video, regarding a Slovenian film writer, which is almost a provocation. One beautiful moment, filmed through a gap in his hotel room's curtains shows a young couple frolicking in the sea, for which brief segment he allows music. It's deliberately voyeuristic though, Guerín is distant he identifies with migrant workers he films in Venice. 　　The films, in an aesthetic sense presents clarity versus confusion, reality versus a dreamer's obfuscation. There's an extent to which what we see is a real correspondence, an extent to which they are talking past one another. Guerín intones that dialogue between filmmakers is an impossibility, over images of fish heads on ice in a market. It's one of two visual quotes I suspected are from Pere Potabella (from Pont de Varsovia). 　　The difference in viewpoint I suspect ultimately is that Mekas sees beauty in the fact that life goes on, wonder in impermanence, Guerín is blanched by it.

This correspondence, or exchange of letters and video diaries between acclaimed filmmakers Jonas Mekas and José Luis Guerin is extremely potent, there's sorcery at play in the mixture of the two. Together they're light and dark. Mekas knows life's joys, and is always a participant in what he films, Guerín is a detached observer, cold, present only as a black mote, reflected in the eye of one of his subjects. Guerín shoots in black and white and strives for formalism, Mekas loves hazard, loves his chaotic hand-held colour camera. Jonas Mekas felt that his images were inferior to those of Guerín, but a picture of his son Sebastian devouring a pickle, followed by Jonas on the deli sausage and wine, and then a cheeky close up of Goethe's Faust; which of them Faust and which Mephistopheles? That one shot set me thinking about the nature of art and the privilege of artists, and could be interpreted in any one of several fruitful ways. 　　Guerín's Camera is brutal, his viewpoint black, on death and distance. He sends Jonas a morbid video, regarding a Slovenian film writer, which is almost a provocation. One beautiful moment, filmed through a gap in his hotel room's curtains shows a young couple frolicking in the sea, for which brief segment he allows music. It's deliberately voyeuristic though, Guerín is distant he identifies with migrant workers he films in Venice. 　　The films, in an aesthetic sense presents clarity versus confusion, reality versus a dreamer's obfuscation. There's an extent to which what we see is a real correspondence, an extent to which they are talking past one another. Guerín intones that dialogue between filmmakers is an impossibility, over images of fish heads on ice in a market. It's one of two visual quotes I suspected are from Pere Potabella (from Pont de Varsovia). 　　The difference in viewpoint I suspect ultimately is that Mekas sees beauty in the fact that life goes on, wonder in impermanence, Guerín is blanched by it.

沈知岚本是豪门太太，因好姐妹苏韵荷的陷害入狱五年，出狱后发现丈夫顾淮远和儿女依旧被苏韵荷蛊惑，对她充满厌恶。面对家人的背叛和伤害，沈知岚心灰意冷，在国际舞蹈大师杨翠萍的帮助下决定远走他乡，开启新的人生。

周若兮为了自己的野心，舍弃与燕王李晏的感情，处心积虑嫁给太子。在她即将权倾天下之际，被李晏以“清君侧，诛妖后”为名，生擒于后宫之中。原来，这是李晏痴心的救赎，他打算带她远走高飞，却不料中了皇帝的阴谋，两人死在皇城之下。在生命的最后一刻，周若兮终于明白自己的错处，发誓若有来世绝不重蹈覆辙，而故事竟真的奇迹般回到伊始。这一次，周若兮想要修正错误、保护李晏，只是没料到，最大的对手竟是三年前的自己……

西越大将军姜离遭未婚妻与挚友陷害，满门被戮。重生为草包帝姬姜姒后，她深知自己只是女帝的挡箭牌。一改往日庸懦，她才华尽显，技压群雄，终登帝位，掌天下权，醉卧美男膝。

大婚之日，本是将军府和穆王府两家阖家欢喜，青梅绕竹马永结同心的大好日子。不料圣旨一道，将穆王府上下三百多条生命送上刑场。穆长欢本该在那日随父母哥嫂一起去那极乐之地，却被神秘女子救下并换了不属于穆长欢的脸，从此踏入吃人的后宫，为穆王府洗去冤屈