Currently in production, “True-ish” follows Janet Paine, a well-intentioned but deeply insecure Manhattan PR executive with a specialty for smear campaigns. “A toxic build-up of stress, alcohol and miscommunication leads to her relocation to the Balkans for a job that sounds noble — director of outreach at a ‘peace lab’ — but in reality involves generating fake news to target political regimes on the fringes of the EU,” the film’s synopsis reads. “Desperate to make amends for past mistakes and show initiative, she ends up staging footage of atrocities that gets her into deeper and deeper trouble, with serious international consequences.”

Currently in production, “True-ish” follows Janet Paine, a well-intentioned but deeply insecure Manhattan PR executive with a specialty for smear campaigns. “A toxic build-up of stress, alcohol and miscommunication leads to her relocation to the Balkans for a job that sounds noble — director of outreach at a ‘peace lab’ — but in reality involves generating fake news to target political regimes on the fringes of the EU,” the film’s synopsis reads. “Desperate to make amends for past mistakes and show initiative, she ends up staging footage of atrocities that gets her into deeper and deeper trouble, with serious international consequences.”

梓安和妈妈还有丈夫秦墨筹办完父亲的葬礼后，三人回到梓安妈妈居住的老房子后， 妈妈便双手抱头， 痛苦的躺在沙发上。作为精神科的医生的秦墨偷偷告诉梓安， 妈妈的病情有加重的迹象， 必须赶紧确定治疗方案才行， 秦墨建议让妈妈医院住院。梓安答应劝劝妈妈。妈妈吃过药后睡着，梦里小声的说出对不起梓童...... 梓安听着妈妈的话有点莫名其妙， 可能是把自己的名字喊错了。 梓安来到父母卧室， 准备把父亲的遗物和衣服收拾下。在一件外套的口袋里面， 梓安意外发现了父亲和小孩子的合影照片，背面隐约看到梓童两个字。梓安想起了妈妈刚才说出梓童这个名字，这个孩子和父亲是什么关系？ 这引起了她巨大的好奇心。

寄人篱下的金闪闪吃不饱饭，以为农药是饮料，一饮而尽，金二强发现后与王玉梅等人坚持隐瞒事实，将闪闪带到农村兽医站进行医治无效，秦雪金大壮夫妻回村后，渐渐发现闪闪死亡的真相。

寄人篱下的金闪闪吃不饱饭，以为农药是饮料，一饮而尽，金二强发现后与王玉梅等人坚持隐瞒事实，将闪闪带到农村兽医站进行医治无效，秦雪金大壮夫妻回村后，渐渐发现闪闪死亡的真相。

祭拜父亲的梓安，无意发现父亲和一个叫梓童的小男孩合影。在她的记忆中，家里并没有这个孩子。经过查找，一些信息勾起了梓安强烈的好奇心，梓童到底是谁？一直在跟随自己的人又是谁？父亲真的是自杀的吗？结果出乎所

陆少炫耀着他手中华丽的天使之翼婚纱，与徐骁朴素的婚纱形成鲜明对比，秦楚然对陆少的婚纱流露出贪婪和羡慕，转而投向陆少，徐骁虽心如刀绞，试图用眼神传达自己的爱意。从秦楚然嘴里得知六年前救自己的是秦汐颜，秦汐颜至此毁容，徐骁最后给秦汐颜了一个隆重的婚礼。

In the UK over £9 billion a year are spent on beauty products that promise to improve and transform us. But how much of what these products promise is based in scientific evidence, and how much is simply marketing manipulation? 　　Cherry Healey teams up with independent scientists to put everyday cosmetics to the test like never before. In a groundbreaking study carried out by the University of Sheffield, and with the help of 25 volunteers, she discovers that moisturisers might not have the benefits people think they do.

In the UK over £9 billion a year are spent on beauty products that promise to improve and transform us. But how much of what these products promise is based in scientific evidence, and how much is simply marketing manipulation? 　　Cherry Healey teams up with independent scientists to put everyday cosmetics to the test like never before. In a groundbreaking study carried out by the University of Sheffield, and with the help of 25 volunteers, she discovers that moisturisers might not have the benefits people think they do.