A storyteller, an ethnic Korean from China living in Japan, revisits fragmented memories, blurring the line between fiction and reality.

90년대 한국 사회를 뒤흔든 그러나 지금은 잊혀진 지존파 사건을 되짚으면서 우리 사회를 들여보게 하는 영화. 지존파에서 출발해 성수대교 붕괴, 삼풍 백화점 붕괴, 5.18 주모자 처벌 문제 등으로 유연하게 흘러가는 영화는 픽션 보다 더 픽션 같은 논픽션 이야기를 품은 한국 사회를 ‘기록’한다. 　　What happened in Korean society in the 1990s? The film starts with the Jijon-pa (Supreme Gangsters) case. The shocking story is narrated through the discussion by the two detectives who arrested the gangsters, of details of the roundup, data screens, and the death sentence. Nevertheless, Nonfiction Diary’s focus is not on the crime story. Starting from Jijon-pa onwards, the film reflects on the 1990s, when Korea digressed into contemporary history. The Seongsu Bridge and the Sampoong Department Store’s collapses are recalled, followed by the then-government’s punishment of the May 18 Uprising leaders, revealing the Korean legal system’s death penalty status, touching on political and power issues. The audience is reminded that today, 2013, is an extension of that same flow. Director Jung Yoonsuk’s Non-fiction Diary “records” the records by summoning forgotten incidents, utilizing interviews and the media’s data screens. This record is a “report”on contemporary society as well as a “record of the remembrance”. (HONG Hyosook) 　　18th Busan International Film Festival Documentary Competition

90년대 한국 사회를 뒤흔든 그러나 지금은 잊혀진 지존파 사건을 되짚으면서 우리 사회를 들여보게 하는 영화. 지존파에서 출발해 성수대교 붕괴, 삼풍 백화점 붕괴, 5.18 주모자 처벌 문제 등으로 유연하게 흘러가는 영화는 픽션 보다 더 픽션 같은 논픽션 이야기를 품은 한국 사회를 ‘기록’한다. 　　What happened in Korean society in the 1990s? The film starts with the Jijon-pa (Supreme Gangsters) case. The shocking story is narrated through the discussion by the two detectives who arrested the gangsters, of details of the roundup, data screens, and the death sentence. Nevertheless, Nonfiction Diary’s focus is not on the crime story. Starting from Jijon-pa onwards, the film reflects on the 1990s, when Korea digressed into contemporary history. The Seongsu Bridge and the Sampoong Department Store’s collapses are recalled, followed by the then-government’s punishment of the May 18 Uprising leaders, revealing the Korean legal system’s death penalty status, touching on political and power issues. The audience is reminded that today, 2013, is an extension of that same flow. Director Jung Yoonsuk’s Non-fiction Diary “records” the records by summoning forgotten incidents, utilizing interviews and the media’s data screens. This record is a “report”on contemporary society as well as a “record of the remembrance”. (HONG Hyosook) 　　18th Busan International Film Festival Documentary Competition

本剧讲述的是与憧憬的前辈偶然重逢，并开始共同生活的青年·神保的故事。

本剧讲述的是与憧憬的前辈偶然重逢，并开始共同生活的青年·神保的故事。

建筑设计师罗家辉在一场私人拍卖意外购得知名艺术家李学东珍贵的早期作品，并打算将其布置在自己筹建的一座“不插电”美术馆最醒目的位置。李学东私下提出希望对方能将这件作品销毁，那只是自己多年前制造的一件艺术垃圾。作为交换，他将依托这里独特的设计理念制作一件永久性交互装置。开幕日期将近切有条不紊地进行，却不想整幢建筑的功能己悄然发生改变。。。

建筑设计师罗家辉在一场私人拍卖意外购得知名艺术家李学东珍贵的早期作品，并打算将其布置在自己筹建的一座“不插电”美术馆最醒目的位置。李学东私下提出希望对方能将这件作品销毁，那只是自己多年前制造的一件艺术垃圾。作为交换，他将依托这里独特的设计理念制作一件永久性交互装置。开幕日期将近切有条不紊地进行，却不想整幢建筑的功能己悄然发生改变。。。

如果说《想当年》是费里尼对少年时代的回忆，《八部半》是对他中年创作危机的记载，《罗马》是对他所爱的城市的礼赞，那么本片就是他对Cinecitta电影厂的颂歌。 　　影片将回忆、嘲讽、自省、幻想等元素融合在一起，让我们见识了镜头前后的各种人物。影片高潮是《甜蜜的生活》的重映把片中主角重新聚集一堂，颇有一点大师主掌央视《同一首歌》的味道。 　　第40届戛纳电影节(1987)　 40周年奖　 费德里科·费里尼 　　第13届凯撒奖(1988)　 凯撒奖-最佳外国电影(提名)　 费德里科·费里尼

如果说《想当年》是费里尼对少年时代的回忆，《八部半》是对他中年创作危机的记载，《罗马》是对他所爱的城市的礼赞，那么本片就是他对Cinecitta电影厂的颂歌。 　　影片将回忆、嘲讽、自省、幻想等元素融合在一起，让我们见识了镜头前后的各种人物。影片高潮是《甜蜜的生活》的重映把片中主角重新聚集一堂，颇有一点大师主掌央视《同一首歌》的味道。 　　第40届戛纳电影节(1987)　 40周年奖　 费德里科·费里尼 　　第13届凯撒奖(1988)　 凯撒奖-最佳外国电影(提名)　 费德里科·费里尼

A dawn to dusk account of a young man in search of a job. This is his day of an interview in a swell Indo-British firm where, logically, he has to look his best. His only suit, a complete one, is in the laundry, and as luck would have it, all city laundries are on strike from that morning. The film is an intense search for a new suit to be borrowed from any of his friends, the loss of a good one procured that way, again a frantic search, and finally the interview-all erratic blending of fictional narrative, news reel coverage and near-cinema-verity type documentation. The film ends with a strange interview between the dejected young man and an unseen spectator who has watched him since the film started. And at last the film arrives at a moment of judgment -- that of the value-world.