"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

"The word 'revolution' to us Frenchmen is not a vague term. We know that Revolution is a rupture, that Revolution is an Absolute. There is no such thing as a moderate revolution, there is no such thing as a planned revolution—as one speaks of a planned economy. The revolution we are announcing will overturn the entire existing order or it will not take place at all. If we believe that the present system is capable of being reformed, that it can, in itself, check the fatal course of its evolution towards Dictatorship—the dictatorship of money, of race, of class, of the Nation—we will certainly refuse to run the risk of an explosion capable of destroying precious things that can only be rebuilt with much time, perseverance, selflessness, and love. But the present system will not change the course of its evolution for the good reason that it is no longer evolving; it is merely reorganizing itself with the view of lasting a little longer, of surviving. Far from professing to resolve its own contradictions, which are, in any case, impossible to resolve, it seems more and more inclined to impose them by force through strict regulation of individual effort that grows more rigid and more particular every day, carried out in the name of a sort of State Socialism, which is the democratic form of Dictatorship. Every day, in fact, brings us another proof that the purely ideological era has long since passed, in New York as well as in Moscow and London. We can see the Imperial English Democracy, the Plutocratic American Democracy and the Marxist Empire of Soviet Dominions walking, if not hand in hand—far from it!—at least pursuing the same goal, that is to say maintaining at all costs and even while appearing to oppose it, the system in which they have acquired wealth and power. For, in the end, Russia has profited no less from the capitalist system than America and England; it has played the role of the Member of Parliament who makes a fortune in Opposition. In short: regimes formerly opposed in ideology are now directly united by Technology. A world dominated by Technology is lost for Liberty."

历史上第一部互动电影（interactive movie），观众可以通过按手中的红绿按钮来投票选择后面的剧情。1967年蒙特利尔世博会上捷克馆的一大看点。影片同时也是贯穿着捷克电影新浪潮的主题。

Documenting Horn & Hardart's iconic Automat, one of America's original and most popular restaurant chins in NYC & Philadelphia.

该剧讲述了战国晚期，纷乱五百余年的华夏大地仍战火不息、 生灵涂炭。彼时六国势弱、秦国独强，天下统一之势渐显。巨商吕不韦携时在赵国为质的嬴异人逃归秦国，幼小的嬴政被弃留邯郸，屡遭生死劫难，也目睹战争带给百姓的痛苦与绝望，心中天下凝一之志由此而生。此后嬴政归秦，在咸阳政治漩涡中经历精神阵痛，蜕变成一个真正王者。为抓住一统天下的时机和力量，实现一统天下的理想抱负，嬴政精心谋划，暗中行动，终于平定嫪毐之乱、亲政、罢相、收复王权。此后又铲除宗室复辟势力，为东出灭国扫清障碍的故事 。

战国晚期，纷乱五百余年的华夏大地仍战火不息、生灵涂炭。彼时六国势弱、秦国独强，天下统一之势渐显。巨商吕不韦携时在赵国为质的嬴异人逃归秦国，幼小的始皇帝嬴政被弃留邯郸，屡遭生死劫难，也目睹战争带给百姓的痛苦与绝望，心中天下凝一之志由此而生。此后嬴政归秦，在咸阳政治漩涡中经历精神阵痛，蜕变成一个真正王者。为抓住一统天下的时机和力量，实现一统天下的理想抱负，精心谋划，暗中行动，终于平定嫪毐之乱，亲政，罢相，收复王权。此后又铲除宗室复辟势力，为东出灭国扫清障碍。在李斯、王翦、蒙恬等一班文臣武将的辅佐下扫灭六国，建立起中华历史上第一个大一统的中央集权国家。

罪臣之女玄芊草资质出众，一心想为父平冤，她积极寻找一个强有力的靠山；皇帝私生子尘同雪被太子算计，形势危急，两个各怀心思的人互相接近，相互利用，最终却在一次次同生共死后爱上对方，携手抗敌，为天下百姓谋一个太平盛世。

谢容瑾遭丈夫赵衡背叛，谢家满门被灭。濒死之 际，她被定国公嫡女顾若芸以命相救，顶替其身份回 归国公府复仇。假扮盲女的谢容瑾与青梅竹马萧君琰 重逢，暗中联手揭露赵衡勾结丞相谋逆的阴谋。她智 斗继母林婉清，化解身份危机，并在成人礼上设计让 仇人自曝罪行。最终，赵衡被盟友毒杀，丞相伏诛。 谢容瑾与萧君琰平反谢家冤案，携手追寻兄长下落， 开启新篇章。

看似是楚国女帝无用的夫君，但林齐实则是天下第一势力，麒麟阁之主。他智勇双全，更有能掌控天下的军事实力。当年，为了妻子沈青瑶的一句“我要天下太平，再无兵乱”，林齐便暗中助其登临帝位。然而登基成为女帝之后，妻子却觉得林齐身无长物，对自己毫无帮助，百般嫌弃，故毫不犹豫地给了他一纸休书。同时，女帝转而爱上了五年来，一直帮助自己、守护自己的麒麟先生。但她却不知，麒麟先生实则就是林齐的另一重身份。为了向心中的“白月光”麒麟先生提亲，女帝不惜加重赋税举办“麒麟宴”，却对林齐苦口婆心的劝诫无动于衷，甚至恶语相向。“能配得上朕的只有麒麟先生，而你林齐只会让朕恶心。”自己的满腔热情，自己五年来的默默付出，却被女帝视作一文不值。林齐想要辩解，然而女帝却不给他丝毫辩解的机会，不仅将他打入天牢，更要将他处死！林齐终于心灰意冷，绝望之际，来自黎国的女帝沐婉灵飘然而至。她英姿飒爽，含情脉脉地盯着林齐，与沈青瑶不同的是，她要以江山为聘嫁给林齐。“沈青瑶，既然你不懂得珍惜，那我便替你珍惜！