乐趣无穷！金敏璟、洪允华、신기루、풍자这些充满积极、乐趣、能量与幸福的女人们，旅行充满趣味，吃播也乐趣十足，连美容相关的事都饶有趣味。“一切都很充实，太有趣了”，她们带着满脸笑容，以趣味主义开启生活。

乐趣无限！充满积极/乐趣/能量/幸福的女人们，金敏璟X洪允华X신기루X풍자 旅行也有趣！吃播也要有趣！Beauty也要有趣！“一切都很充实，太有趣了”充满笑容和乐趣的她们的趣味主义生活

讲述德国重要的哲学流派——法兰克福学派的思想内容和历史。由3sat推出。

“The cinematic spectacle has its rules, which enable one to produce satisfactory products. But dissatisfaction is the reality that must be taken as a point of departure. Whether dramatic or documentary, the cinema functions to present a false, isolated coherence as a substitute for communication and an activity that are absent. To demystify documentary cinema it is necessary to dissolve what is called its subject matter.” In this fascinating, seminal anti-film, Guy Debord articulates in full flesh his situationist manifesto, superimposing subtitles and a documentary-style commentary on a catalog of newsreel footage, book covers, rephotographed photographs, views of Paris’ neighborhoods, and seemingly candid footage of him and his friends in wandering between cafes and the street. Whereas the conventions of narrative fictional film would oblige us to separate the filmmaker Debord from both the voice of the film’s commentary and from the “character” played by Debord, a man in his late twenties pursuing a young girl who appears to be no more than seventeen. (源自: TIDF 2024)

BACKGROUND 　　Xu Tong is a documentary director. His work “Wheat Harvest”, was opposed by a small group of people for violating the privacy of sexual workers and copyright, ironically, these complaints help to let more people to know and watch this film. 　　WuHaoHao failed to film Xu Tong and used his materials about such incident as he couldn't get the copyright. Throughout the process of production, he criticized himself, the society, documentary format by deconstructing video, sound and text he got when he interview Xu Tong. Like using paper cutting, or his individual voice over to repeat the interview. 　　CONCEPT 　　The way the director criticizing documentary format by deconstructing the video, sound and text of his interview with Xu Tong inspired me to deconstruct all the Chinese characters for all the titles on the poster. 　　背景 　　徐童，紀錄片導演，他的作品《麥收》因涉及侵權與偷拍性工作者而引起小範圍反對，但諷刺地，這卻讓更多的人關注此片。 　　吳昊昊因未能得到徐童的允許，在製作該視頻作品中，所以他只能利用剪紙，或用個人旁白來重複訪問內容等方式製作。他解構視頻、聲音、文字的同時，發現原來也在批判自己、社會、和記錄片。 　　概念 　　海報的設計概念來自導演透過對紀錄片的視頻，聲音，文字，不斷解構而進行批判的這個行為，故海報中全部標題的漢字都被分拆，解構。

义经伊美瑠希望成为工作稳定的公务员，却突然被分配给「接受生活保护者」，成为社会福利机关的调查员。作为新人的她在工作上不熟练，但是很重感情，做任何事都全力以赴。她为了帮助因为各种原因领取生活保障的人们，伊美瑠作为调查员新人一直在努力，为了能拯救更多的人走自己的路....

义经伊美瑠希望成为工作稳定的公务员，却突然被分配给「接受生活保护者」，成为社会福利机关的调查员。作为新人的她在工作上不熟练，但是很重感情，做任何事都全力以赴。她为了帮助因为各种原因领取生活保障的人们，伊美瑠作为调查员新人一直在努力，为了能拯救更多的人走自己的路....

宫藤官九郎原创剧本。“昭和大叔”的主人公·小川市郎因意外从1986年穿越到2024年的现代。市郎是中学的体育老师，同时也是棒球部的顾问，被称为“地狱的小川”，用词粗鲁，经常做出令和无法想象的“不合适”言行。另外，妻子因病去世，他也是在家对独生女的不良行为束手无策的普通父亲。对于合规意识低下的“昭和大叔”市郎来说，在令和总是会说出一些“不合适”的话。但市郎的这种极端观点，给了被规则束缚的令和人们思考的契机。

吴昊昊采访自己电影学院各个系的同学，对自己的电影学院进行批判。 　　Haohao Wu interviewed some of the classmates in the film academy and criticized the film academy.

在剧集的最终回中，时光机巴士失效，小川市郎（阿部隆史 饰）被迫回到昭和。然而，就在此时，来自未来的井上教授出现在市郎面前，并向他伸出橄榄枝：“想去哪个时代都行，走吧！”——将他引入了时光隧道。在2026年春季播出的特别篇，将继续讲述这个故事的后续。如今能够自由穿梭时代的昭和大叔市郎，究竟会在哪个时代掀起新一轮的“不合适风波”呢？